Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30009357›Full record

ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2018

Multiple Phases of Climbing Fiber Synapse Elimination in the Developing Cerebellum.

Masanobu Kano, Takaki Watanabe, Naofumi Uesaka, Masahiko Watanabe

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. mGluR1 signaling is necessary for strengthening winner climbing fiber inputs in the developing mouse cerebellum.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular and Anatomical Strengthening of "Winner" Climbing Fiber Synapses in Developing Mouse Purkinje Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  15. Lurcher Mouse as a Model of Cerebellar Syndromes.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A neural algorithm for computing bipartite matchings.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Masanobu KanoDepartment of Neurophysiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan. mkano-tky@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0725-3292
Takaki WatanabeDepartment of Neurophysiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Naofumi UesakaDepartment of Neurophysiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Masahiko WatanabeDepartment of Anatomy, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPHokkaido University · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development Brain/MINDSJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development SRPBSJapan Society for the Promotion of Science 24220007Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25000015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional neural circuits in the mature animals are shaped during postnatal development by elimination of unnecessary synapses and strengthening of necessary ones among redundant synaptic connections formed transiently around birth. In the cerebellum of neonatal rodents, excitatory synapses are formed on the somata of Purkinje cells (PCs) by climbing fibers (CFs) that originate from neurons in the contralateral inferior olive. Each PC receives inputs from multiple (~ five) CFs that have about equal synaptic strengths. Subsequently, a single CF selectively becomes stronger relative to the other CFs during the first postnatal week. Then, from around postnatal day 9 (P9), only the strongest CF ("winner" CF) extends its synaptic territory along PC dendrites. In contrast, synapses of the weaker CFs ("loser" CFs) remain on the soma and the most proximal portion of the dendrite together with somatic synapses of the "winner" CF. These perisomatic CF synapses are eliminated progressively during the second and the third postnatal weeks. From P6 to P11, the elimination proceeds independently of the formation of the synapses on PC dendrites by parallel fibers (PFs). From P12 and thereafter, the elimination requires normal PF-PC synapse formation and is presumably dependent on the PF synaptic inputs. Most PCs become mono-innervated by single strong CFs on their dendrites in the third postnatal week. In this review article, we will describe how adult-type CF mono-innervation of PC is established through these multiple phases of postnatal cerebellar development and make an overview of molecular/cellular mechanisms underlying them.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebellumNeural PathwaysNeuronsOlivary NucleusSynapsesCerebellumClimbing fiberDevelopmentPurkinje cellSynapse elimination

Identifiers

PMID30009357
OpenAlexW2883082006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.