Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30009212›Full record

ReviewMovement disorders clinical practice

Systematic Review of Rehabilitation in Focal Dystonias: Classification and Recommendations.

Cecília N Prudente, Lena Zetterberg, Annika Bring, Lynley Bradnam, Teresa J Kimberley

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Movement disorders clinical practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Optimal physiotherapy management strategies for cervical dystonia: an international Delphi study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genetic Update and Treatment for Dystonia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. How Do I Rehabilitate Patients with Cervical Dystonia Remotely?Movement disorders clinical practice · 2021
    Article
  14. Neurorehabilitation in dystonia: a holistic perspective.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Treatment of Dystonia: Medications, Neurotoxins, Neuromodulation, and Rehabilitation.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Cecília N PrudenteDivision of Physical Therapy Department of Rehabilitation Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1296-8062
Lena ZetterbergDepartment of Neuroscience Section of Physiotherapy Uppsala University and University Hospital Uppsala Sweden.
Annika BringDepartment of Neuroscience Section of Physiotherapy Uppsala University and University Hospital Uppsala Sweden.
Lynley BradnamGraduate School of Health University of Technology Sydney Sydney Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3067-0326
Teresa J KimberleyDivision of Physical Therapy Department of Rehabilitation Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.
University of Minnesota · USUppsala University Hospital · SEUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

A Multimodal Assessment of Neurophysiology in Focal DystoniaR01DC015216 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KIMBERLEY, TERESA JACOBSON · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRehabilitation interventions are rarely utilized as an alternative or adjunct therapy for focal dystonias. Reasons for limited utilization are unknown, but lack of conclusive evidence of effectiveness is likely a crucial factor. METHODS AND

findingsThe purpose of this systematic review was to determine the level of evidence for rehabilitation interventions in focal dystonias. Rehabilitation interventions were classified based upon the underlying theoretical basis of different approaches, and the strength of evidence for each category was evaluated to identify gaps in the field. Prospective studies using rehabilitation methods in cervical, hand, and foot dystonia were reviewed. The key elements of treatments tested were identified and studies were grouped into six categories based on the theoretical basis of the intervention: (1) movement practice, (2) training with constraint, (3) sensory reorganization, (4) normalization of muscle activity with external techniques, (5) neuromodulation with training, and (6) compensatory strategies. Quality of the body of evidence ranged from very low-to-low according to the grades of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE). Despite inconclusive evidence for these rehabilitation approaches, data suggest that intensive movement practice and neuromodulation combined with motor training should be further explored.

conclusionsThis systematic review presents a novel approach to classify studies of rehabilitation in focal dystonias based on the theoretical basis of intervention. The proposed classification system will move toward a unified theoretical understanding of rehabilitation interventions in dystonia. Moreover, it will help provide recommendations for clinical applications and future investigations.

Indexed as

focal dystoniarehabilitationsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30009212
PMCPMC6032834
OpenAlexW2774452580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.