Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30009038›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology research and practice2018

The utility of patient reported data in a gynecologic oncology clinic.

D Barnes, R Rivera, S Gibson, C Craig, J Cragun, B Monk, D Chase

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology research and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. A proposed tailored investigational algorithm for women treated for gynaecological cancer with long-term gastrointestinal consequences.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D Barnes1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Creighton University School of Medicine at St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8459-7945
R Rivera1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Creighton University School of Medicine at St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ USA.
S Gibson2University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ USA.
C Craig1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Creighton University School of Medicine at St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ USA.
J Cragun2University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ USA.
B Monk1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Creighton University School of Medicine at St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ USA.
D Chase1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Creighton University School of Medicine at St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ USA.
Creighton University · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasuring QoL is essential to the field of gynecologic oncology but there seems to be limited standardized data regarding collecting QoL assessments throughout a patient's cancer treatment especially in non-clinical trial patients. The aim of this study is to explore patient characteristics that may be associated with poor quality of life (QoL) in women with gynecologic cancers at two University of Arizona Cancer Center (UACC) sites.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among English speaking women with gynecologic malignancies at the University of Arizona Cancer Centers in Phoenix and Tucson from April 2012 to July 2015. The survey was a paper packet of questions that was distributed to cancer patients at the time of their clinic visit. The packet contained questions on demographic information, treatment, lifestyle characteristics, pelvic pain and Health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Measures included the generic and cancer-specific scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and the Female Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI). The total scores and subdomains were compared with descriptive variables (age, body mass index (BMI), diet, exercise, disease status, treatment and support group attendance) using Cronbach alpha (α), Spearman rank correlations (ρ), and Holm's Bonferroni method.

resultsOne-hundred and forty-nine women completed the survey; 55% (

conclusionsThis study identified potential areas of clinical focus, which aid in understanding our approach to caring for gynecologic cancer patients and improvement of their HRQoL. We identified that age, pelvic pain, and lifestyle characteristics have indicators to poor QoL in women with gynecologic cancers. In this population, younger women and those with pelvic pain complaints, poor diet and exercise habits should be targeted early for supportive care interventions to improve QoL throughout both treatment and survivorship.

Identifiers

PMID30009038
PMCPMC6044081
OpenAlexW2850598529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.