Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30008860›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2018

Combination of procalcitonin, C-reaction protein and carcinoembryonic antigens for discriminating between benign and malignant pleural effusions.

Mingde Ji, Xiaofei Zhu, Jie Dong, Shining Qian, Fei Meng, Wanjian Gu, Wen Qiu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mingde JiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, P.R. China.
Xiaofei ZhuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, P.R. China.
Jie DongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, P.R. China.
Shining QianDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, P.R. China.
Fei MengDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, P.R. China.
Wanjian GuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, P.R. China.
Wen QiuDepartment of Immunology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211166, P.R. China.
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pleural effusion (PE) is a common manifestation associated with certain chest diseases. However, there is no effective diagnostic marker with high sensitivity and specificity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of several biomarkers in the use of detecting malignant pleural disorder. One hundred and fifty patients with a specific diagnosis of exudative PE were enrolled in this study and were divided into the benign PE group (n=93) and the malignant PE group (n=57). Thoracoscopy was conducted to identify the reasons for the PE. Biomarkers in pleural fluid and in sera were determined either by microparticle enzyme immunoassay [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)], fluorescence immunoassay [procalcitonin (PCT)] or light-scattering turbidimetric immunoassay [C-reaction protein (CRP)]. Then, correlation analysis and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis individually or in combination were performed. The CRP and PCT levels were higher in benign PE than they were in malignant PE (PCT: P=0.017, P=0.032; CRP: P=0.001, P<0.001, respectively), while CEA levels were lower in benign PE than in malignant PE (CEA: P=0.001, P=0.001, respectively). During the ROC curve analysis, an optimal discrimination was identified by combining pleural CRP, pleural CEA and serum (s)PCT with an area under the curve of 0.973 (sensitivity, 98.9%; specificity, 89.5%). In the diagnosis of PE, there was no single biomarker that appeared to be adequately accurate. The combination of pleural CRP, pleural CEA and sPCT may represent an efficient diagnostic procedure for guiding the patient towards follow-up clinical treatment.

Indexed as

biomarkerCEACRPPCTpleural effusion

Identifiers

PMID30008860
PMCPMC6036474
OpenAlexW2805802663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.