Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30008766›Full record

ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2018

Two-year clinical outcomes after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (Absorb) in stable angina and acute coronary syndrome patients. Single-centre real-life registry data.

Ieva Briede, Inga Narbute, Indulis Kumsars, Dace Sondore, Karlis Trushinskis, Sanda Jegere, Gustavs Latkovskis, Karlis Strenge, Ainars Rudzitis, Andrejs Erglis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a step back thinking of the future.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ieva BriedeLatvian Centre of Cardiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Inga NarbuteLatvian Centre of Cardiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
Indulis KumsarsLatvian Centre of Cardiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Dace SondoreLatvian Centre of Cardiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
Karlis TrushinskisLatvian Centre of Cardiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
Sanda JegereLatvian Centre of Cardiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
Gustavs LatkovskisLatvian Centre of Cardiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Karlis StrengeLatvian Centre of Cardiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
Ainars RudzitisLatvian Centre of Cardiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
Andrejs ErglisLatvian Centre of Cardiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital · LVUniversity of Latvia · LV

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this long-term registry data was to evaluate 2-year clinical and angiographic outcomes after implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (Absorb) from the Latvian Centre of Cardiology Real-life Registry. MATERIAL AND

methodsBetween November 2012 and December 2014 in the Centre of Cardiology Real-life Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Registry, 187 patients with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome and available 2-year follow-up were selected. All patients had percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following bioresorbable scaffold (Absorb) implantation. At 2 years, clinical parameters were analysed in stable angina and acute coronary syndrome subgroups: all-cause death, cardiac death, non-cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), scaffold thrombosis (ST), cerebral infarction, in-scaffold restenosis and bleeding.

resultsThe clinical follow-up rate at 2 years was 96.2%. In-hospital death occurred in 2 (1.1%) patients, and 1 (0.5%) patient had in-hospital MI. At 2 years, the rate of all-cause death was 3.9% (

conclusionsBioresorbable scaffolds showed acceptable efficacy (target lesion revascularization) and safety (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and scaffold thrombosis) results at mid-term follow-up in stable angina and acute coronary syndrome patients.

Indexed as

bioresorbable vascular scaffoldpercutaneous coronary interventionscaffold thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID30008766
PMCPMC6041844
OpenAlexW2810637076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.