Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30008744›Full record

ReviewGastroenterology research and practice2018

Noninvasive Biomarkers of Colorectal Cancer: Role in Diagnosis and Personalised Treatment Perspectives.

Gianluca Pellino, Gaetano Gallo, Pierlorenzo Pallante, Raffaella Capasso, Alfonso De Stefano, Isacco Maretto, Umberto Malapelle, Shengyang Qiu, Stella Nikolaou, Andrea Barina and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Predictive role of [EJNMMI reports · 2024
    Article
  17. Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Gianluca PellinoUnit of General Surgery, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Ageing Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8322-6421
Gaetano GalloDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, OU of General Surgery, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1066-4671
Pierlorenzo PallanteInstitute of Experimental Endocrinology and Oncology (IEOS), National Research Council (CNR), Via S. Pansini 5, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7319-684X
Raffaella CapassoDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Via Francesco de Sanctis 1, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6033-8463
Alfonso De StefanoDepartment of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Abdominal Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, "Fondazione G. Pascale, " IRCCS, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2107-1177
Isacco Maretto1st Surgical Clinic, Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Umberto MalapelleDipartimento di Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3211-9957
Shengyang QiuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Stella NikolaouDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6450-6463
Andrea Barina1st Surgical Clinic, Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Giuseppe ClericoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Clinic S. Rita, Vercelli, Italy.
Alfonso ReginelliDepartment of Internal and Experimental Medicine, Magrassi-Lanzara, Institute of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Antonio GiulianiDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Guido SciaudoneUnit of General Surgery, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Ageing Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Christos KontovounisiosDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1828-1395
Luca BruneseDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Via Francesco de Sanctis 1, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Mario TrompettoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Clinic S. Rita, Vercelli, Italy.
Francesco SelvaggiUnit of General Surgery, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Ageing Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3219-3797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. It has been estimated that more than one-third of patients are diagnosed when CRC has already spread to the lymph nodes. One out of five patients is diagnosed with metastatic CRC. The stage of diagnosis influences treatment outcome and survival. Notwithstanding the recent advances in multidisciplinary management and treatment of CRC, patients are still reluctant to undergo screening tests because of the associated invasiveness and discomfort (e.g., colonoscopy with biopsies). Moreover, the serological markers currently used for diagnosis are not reliable and, even if they were useful to detect disease recurrence after treatment, they are not always detected in patients with CRC (e.g., CEA). Recently, translational research in CRC has produced a wide spectrum of potential biomarkers that could be useful for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of these patients. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the newer noninvasive or minimally invasive biomarkers of CRC. Here, we discuss imaging and biomolecular diagnostics ranging from their potential usefulness to obtain early and less-invasive diagnosis to their potential implementation in the development of a bespoke treatment of CRC.

Identifiers

PMID30008744
PMCPMC6020538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.