Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30008733›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2018

Applications of New Breeding Technologies for Potato Improvement.

Amir Hameed, Syed Shan-E-Ali Zaidi, Sara Shakir, Shahid Mansoor

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Genome editing of susceptibility geneFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Profiling of Potato (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Ectopic expression of theFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amir HameedDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biotechnology, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Syed Shan-E-Ali ZaidiAgricultural Biotechnology Division, National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Sara ShakirAgricultural Biotechnology Division, National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Shahid MansoorAgricultural Biotechnology Division, National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering · PKGovernment College University, Faisalabad · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first decade of genetic engineering primarily focused on quantitative crop improvement. With the advances in technology, the focus of agricultural biotechnology has shifted toward both quantitative and qualitative crop improvement, to deal with the challenges of food security and nutrition. Potato (

Indexed as

CRISPRgenome editingnutritional qualitypotatoTALEN

Identifiers

PMID30008733
PMCPMC6034203
OpenAlexW2808359357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.