Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30008647›Full record

ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2018

Marta Stawczyk-Macieja, Aneta Szczerkowska-Dobosz, Krzysztof Rębała, Magdalena Gabig-Cimińska, Roman J Nowicki, Agnieszka Haraś, Lidia Cybulska, Ewa Kapińska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Associations betweenBioMed research international · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marta Stawczyk-MaciejaDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Aneta Szczerkowska-DoboszDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Krzysztof RębałaDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Magdalena Gabig-CimińskaInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, affiliated with the University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Roman J NowickiDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Agnieszka HaraśDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Lidia CybulskaDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Ewa KapińskaDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Gdańsk Medical University · PLInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction

aimTo compare the association between known genetic risk markers and psoriasis in a cohort of northern Polish patients with psoriasis and healthy controls. MATERIAL AND

methodsBased on previous studies' results, five susceptibility loci:

resultsThe study population showed a significant association of psoriasis and a single nucleotide polymorphism in the

conclusionsIn the context of pathogenesis of psoriasis, our findings might give the evidence on disturbances in the proteolytic processing of N-terminal fragments of antigens presented via major histocompatibility complex class I to T cells.

Indexed as

genetic polymorphismgenome-wide association studiespsoriasis

Identifiers

PMID30008647
PMCPMC6041718
OpenAlexW2809321143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.