Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30008142›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2018

Genome size estimation of brackishwater fishes and penaeid shrimps by flow cytometry.

A Swathi, M S Shekhar, Vinaya Kumar Katneni, K K Vijayan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genome sequencing of3 Biotech · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mobile Elements in Ray-Finned Fish Genomes.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A SwathiGenetics and Biotechnology Unit, Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture, 75, Santhome High Road, R. A. Puram, Chennai, India.
M S ShekharGenetics and Biotechnology Unit, Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture, 75, Santhome High Road, R. A. Puram, Chennai, India. msshekhar@ciba.res.in.
Vinaya Kumar KatneniGenetics and Biotechnology Unit, Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture, 75, Santhome High Road, R. A. Puram, Chennai, India.
K K VijayanGenetics and Biotechnology Unit, Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture, 75, Santhome High Road, R. A. Puram, Chennai, India.
Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture · IN

Funding

Indian Council of Agricultural Research CRP-GENOMICS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow cytometry was used for estimating the genome size of five brackishwater finfish and four shrimp species. The genome size for Lutjanus argentimaculatus was 0.95 ± 0.10 and 0.79 ± 0.01 pg for Scatophagus argus. The genome sizes for Chanos chanos (0.72 ± 0.01 pg), Etroplus suratensis (1.71 ± 0.16 pg) and Liza macrolepis (0.87 ± 0.02 pg) which are important aquaculture species are reported for the first time in this study. The phylogenetic tree constructed using sixty-seven sequence accessions of cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene of Lates calcarifer revealed two separate clades. The Indian Lates calcarifer species with estimated genome size of 0.44 ± 0.02 pg belonged to a clade different than that of South East Asia and Australia reported to have larger genome size. The genome size for the four major species of genus Penaeus (Penaeus monodon, Penaeus indicus, Penaeus vannamei and Penaeus japonicus) were found in similar range. The genome size of female shrimps ranged from 2.91 ± 0.03 pg (P. monodon) to 2.14 ± 0.02 pg (P. japonicus). In male shrimps, the genome size ranged from 2.86 ± 0.06 pg (P. monodon) to 2.19 ± 0.02 pg (P. indicus). Significant difference was observed in the genome size between male and female shrimp of all species except in P. monodon. The highest relative difference of 12.78% was observed in the genome size between the either sex in P. indicus. The interspecific relative difference of 30.59% in genome size was highest between the male shrimps of P. monodon and P. indicus and 35.98% between the female shrimps of P. monodon and P. japonicus. The stored gills and pleopod tissues could be successfully used up to 3 weeks to estimate the genome size in shrimps.

Indexed as

AnimalsAquacultureFemaleFishesFlow CytometryGenomeGenome SizeMalePenaeidaePhylogenySaline WatersBrackishwaterFinfishFlow cytometryGenome sizeShrimp

Identifiers

PMID30008142
OpenAlexW2884352380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.