Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30008075›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2019

A systematic review of 3251 emergency department thoracotomies: is it time for a national database?

Edward John Nevins, Nicholas Thomas Edward Bird, Hassan Zakria Malik, Simon Jude Mercer, Khalid Shahzad, Raimundas Lunevicius, John Vincent Taylor, Nikhil Misra

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Development of novel thoracic retractor for resuscitative thoracotomy.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edward John NevinsEmergency General Surgery and Trauma Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK. dr.e.nevins@gmail.com.
Nicholas Thomas Edward BirdEmergency General Surgery and Trauma Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK.
Hassan Zakria MalikLiverpool Medical School, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Simon Jude MercerLiverpool Medical School, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Khalid ShahzadEmergency General Surgery and Trauma Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK.
Raimundas LuneviciusEmergency General Surgery and Trauma Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK.
John Vincent TaylorEmergency General Surgery and Trauma Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK.
Nikhil MisraEmergency General Surgery and Trauma Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEmergency department thoracotomy (EDT) is a potentially life-saving procedure, performed on patients suffering traumatic cardiac arrest. Multiple indications have been reported, but overall survival remains unclear for each indication. The objective of this systematic review is to determine overall survival, survival stratified by indication, and survival stratified by geographical location for patients undergoing EDT across the world.

methodsArticles published between 2000 and 2016 were identified which detailed outcomes from EDT. All articles referring to pre-hospital, delayed, or operating room thoracotomy were excluded. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated comparing differing indications.

resultsThirty-seven articles, containing 3251 patients who underwent EDT, were identified. There were 277 (8.5%) survivors. OR demonstrate improved survival for; penetrating vs blunt trauma (OR 2.10; p 0.0028); stab vs gun-shot (OR 5.45; p < 0.0001); signs of life (SOL) on admission vs no SOL (OR 5.36; p < 0.0001); and SOL in the field vs no SOL (OR 19.39; p < 0.0001). Equivalence of survival was demonstrated between cardiothoracic vs non-cardiothoracic injury (OR 1.038; p 1.000). Survival was worse for USA vs non-USA cohorts (OR 1.59; p 0.0012).

conclusionsPenetrating injury remains a robust indication for EDT. Non-cardiothoracic cause of cardiac arrest should not preclude EDT. In the absence of on scene SOL, survival following EDT is extremely unlikely. Survival is significantly higher in the non-USA publications; reasons for this are highly complex. A UK multicentre prospective study which collects standardised data on all EDTs could provide robust evidence for better patient stratification.

Indexed as

Database Management SystemsEmergency Service, HospitalHeart ArrestHumansThoracic InjuriesThoracotomyTreatment OutcomeEmergency department thoracotomyIndicationsOutcomeSurvivalTraumatic cardiac arrest

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.