Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30008048›Full record

ArticleJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2018

Two-stage oxygen supply strategy based on energy metabolism analysis for improving acetic acid production by Acetobacter pasteurianus.

Yu Zheng, Yangang Chang, Renkuan Zhang, Jia Song, Ying Xu, Jing Liu, Min Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Improving the Acetic Acid Fermentation ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu ZhengState Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology, Ministry of Education, Tianjin Engineering Research Center of Microbial Metabolism and Fermentation Process Control, College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, 300457, People's Republic of China.
Yangang ChangState Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology, Ministry of Education, Tianjin Engineering Research Center of Microbial Metabolism and Fermentation Process Control, College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, 300457, People's Republic of China.
Renkuan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology, Ministry of Education, Tianjin Engineering Research Center of Microbial Metabolism and Fermentation Process Control, College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, 300457, People's Republic of China.
Jia SongState Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology, Ministry of Education, Tianjin Engineering Research Center of Microbial Metabolism and Fermentation Process Control, College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, 300457, People's Republic of China.
Ying XuState Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology, Ministry of Education, Tianjin Engineering Research Center of Microbial Metabolism and Fermentation Process Control, College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, 300457, People's Republic of China.
Jing LiuState Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology, Ministry of Education, Tianjin Engineering Research Center of Microbial Metabolism and Fermentation Process Control, College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, 300457, People's Republic of China.
Min WangState Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology, Ministry of Education, Tianjin Engineering Research Center of Microbial Metabolism and Fermentation Process Control, College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, 300457, People's Republic of China. minw@tust.edu.cn.
Tianjin University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

Innovative Research Team of Tianjin Municipal Education Commission TD13-5013National Key R&D Program of China 2016YFD0400505National Natural Science Foundation of China 31471722National Natural Science Foundation of China 31671851Rural Affairs Committee of Tianjin 201701180Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission 16YFZCNC00650Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission 17PTGCCX00190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oxygen acts as the electron acceptor to oxidize ethanol by acetic acid bacteria during acetic acid fermentation. In this study, the energy release rate from ethanol and glucose under different aerate rate were compared, and the relationship between energy metabolism and acetic acid fermentation was analyzed. The results imply that proper oxygen supply can maintain the reasonable energy metabolism and cell tolerance to improve the acetic acid fermentation. Further, the transcriptions of genes that involve in the ethanol oxidation, TCA cycle, ATP synthesis and tolerance protein expression were analyzed to outline the effect of oxygen supply on cell metabolism of Acetobacter pasteurianus. Under the direction of energy metabolism framework a rational two-stage oxygen supply strategy was established to release the power consumption and substrates volatilization during acetic acid fermentation. As a result, the acetic acid production rate of 1.86 g/L/h was obtained, which were 20.78% higher than that of 0.1 vvm one-stage aerate rate. And the final acetic acid concentration and the stoichiometric yield were 88.5 g/L and 94.1%, respectively, which were 84.6 g/L and 89.5% for 0.15 vvm one-stage aerate rate.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismAcetic AcidAcetobacterBacterial ProteinsColony Count, MicrobialEthanolFermentationGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGlucoseMicrobial ViabilityOxidation-ReductionOxygenProteomicsAcetic AcidBacterial ProteinsEthanolGlucoseOxygenAcetic acid fermentationAcetobacter pasteurianusEnergy metabolismOxygen supply

Identifiers

PMID30008048
OpenAlexW2884040284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.