ArticleNeurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)2018
Treatment of infantile spasms in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Factors in first-time adrenocorticotropic hormone therapy and their influence on spasm control time in infantile spasms: a Cox proportional-hazards regression model analysis].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the treatment approach and compliance of pediatric neurologists with evidence-based guidelines across Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). These guidelines that clarify the optimal management of infantile spasms (IS) are not widely followed for various practical reasons.
methodsPhysicians practicing in the field of pediatric neurology in KSA were contacted from the database of national societies. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured 20-item on-line survey designed to examine their clinical experience with IS and their treatment choices.
resultsA total of 52 pediatric neurologists completed the survey (69% estimated capture rate). They received their formal training within KSA (40%), North America (33%), or Europe (14%). The majority practiced in 2 major cities, Riyadh (46%) or Jeddah (19%). Vigabatrin was favored over adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) as first line drug for patients without tuberous sclerosis complex (48% vs. 21%). Several factors correlated with correctly selecting ACTH as first line including western training (33% vs. 5%, p=0.001), practicing in the city of Riyadh (25% vs. 14%, p=0.001), or having >10 years of clinical experience (25% vs. 5%, p=0.017). Reasons for not complying with the recommended treatment guidelines included lack of availability of ACTH (42%), side effect profile of steroids (29%), and personal preferences (14%). Only 4% admitted lack of awareness of the currently published management guidelines.
conclusionMany pediatric neurologists in KSA are not following the published IS management guidelines. Using ACTH as first line correlated with their training, practice location, and years of experience. Lack of drug availability and side effect profile were common reasons for not complying with the management guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.