Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30007925›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2018

Importance of clinical educators to research use and suggestions for better efficiency and effectiveness: results of a cross-sectional survey of care aides in Canadian long-term care facilities.

T K T Lo, Matthias Hoben, Peter G Norton, Gary F Teare, Carole A Estabrooks

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

T K T LoFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5925-9549
Matthias HobenFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Peter G NortonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Gary F TeareSaskatchewan Health Quality Council, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Carole A EstabrooksFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study explored the effect of clinical educators as facilitators of research use and how it may be modified by organisational context in the settings.

designCross-sectional observational study.

settingA representative sample of 91 residential long-term care (LTC) facilities across Western Canada.

participantsWe used surveys to collect data from the frontline care aides and information about the organisational context of the care units. OUTCOME MEASURE AND EXPLANATORY VARIABLES: We assessed research use (the outcome) with the Conceptual Research Utilization (CRU) scale. Explanatory variables in the multiple regression analysis were facilitation, organisational context and the interaction terms. Facilitation was measured by the frequency of contacts between care aides and clinical educator or person who brings new ideas about resident care. Three core organisational context variables were measured using the Alberta Context Tool.

resultsWe included data of 3873 care aides from 294 care units in the LTC facilities. We found significant associations between CRU and facilitation, leadership, culture and evaluation. Interactions of facilitation x leadership and facilitation x culture were negative. The coefficient of the facilitation x evaluation term in the regression model was positive (0.019, 95% CI 0.012 to 0.026), suggesting synergistic effects between facilitation and a well-developed process to evaluate care quality using relevant data.

conclusionsFindings indicate clinical educators are effective facilitators of research use among the care aides, but the effect is modified by organisational context. For greatest impact, managers can direct efforts of the clinical educators to care units where leadership and culture ratings are lowest, but a proficient feedback and evaluation process is in place. This understanding enables managers to deploy clinical educators (a scarce resource in LTC settings) most efficiently.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareResearchAdultAgedAlbertaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesLong-Term CareMaleMiddle AgedNursing AssistantsNursing HomesRegression AnalysisSurveys and QuestionnairesCare aidesclinical educatorscultureevaluationevidencefacilitationfeedbackimplementationleadershipnursing homesorganisational contextquality improvementresearch use

Identifiers

PMID30007925
PMCPMC6082467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.