Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30007591›Full record

ReviewOphthalmology2018

Rho Kinase Inhibitors as a Novel Treatment for Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.

Angelo P Tanna, Mark Johnson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 137 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
23.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 254 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of rho-kinase inhibitors in uveitic glaucoma and ocular hypertension secondary to uveitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy and ocular safety of Rho-kinase inhibitor in glaucoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review of prospective randomized trials.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angelo P TannaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: atanna@northwestern.edu.
Mark JohnsonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

The Mechanical Basis of Primary Open Angle GlaucomaR01EY019696 · NEI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI FREDBERG, JEFFREY J, JOHNSON, MARK · 2009 to 2019
$7.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an elegant example of bench-to-bedside research, a hypothesis that cells in the outflow pathway actively regulate conventional outflow resistance was proposed in the 1990s and systematically pursued, exposing novel cellular and molecular mechanisms of intraocular pressure (IOP) regulation. The critical discovery that pharmacologic manipulation of the cytoskeleton of outflow pathway cells decreased outflow resistance placed a spotlight on the Rho kinase pathway that was known to regulate the cytoskeleton. Ultimately, a search for Rho kinase inhibitors led to the discovery of several molecules of therapeutic interest, leaving us today with 2 new ocular hypotensive agents approved for clinical use: ripasudil in Japan and netarsudil in the United States. These represent members of the first new class of clinically useful ocular hypotensive agents since the US Food and Drug Administration approval of latanoprost in 1996. The development of Rho kinase inhibitors as a class of medications to lower IOP in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension represents a triumph in translational research. Rho kinase inhibitors are effective alone or when combined with other known ocular hypotensive medications. They also offer the possibility of neuroprotective activity, a favorable impact on ocular blood flow, and even an antifibrotic effect that may prove useful in conventional glaucoma surgery. Local adverse effects, however, including conjunctival hyperemia, subconjunctival hemorrhages, and cornea verticillata, are common. Development of Rho kinase inhibitors targeted to the cells of the outflow pathway and the retina may allow these agents to have even greater clinical impact. The objectives of this review are to describe the basic science underlying the development of Rho kinase inhibitors as a therapy to lower IOP and to summarize the results of the clinical studies reported to date. The neuroprotective and vasoactive properties of Rho kinase inhibitors, as well as the antifibrotic properties, of these agents are reviewed in the context of their possible role in the medical and surgical treatment of glaucoma.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsAqueous HumorBenzoatesbeta-AlanineGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureIsoquinolinesOcular Hypertensionrho-Associated KinasesSulfonamidesTranslational Research, BiomedicalAntihypertensive AgentsBenzoatesbeta-AlanineIsoquinolinesK-115netarsudilrho-Associated KinasesSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID30007591
PMCPMC6188806
OpenAlexW2884952526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.