Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30006930›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2018

Toward a real liquid biopsy in metastatic breast and prostate cancer: Diagnostic LeukApheresis increases CTC yields in a European prospective multicenter study (CTCTrap).

Kiki C Andree, Anouk Mentink, Leonie L Zeune, Leon W M M Terstappen, Nikolas H Stoecklein, Rui P Neves, Christiane Driemel, Rita Lampignano, Liwen Yang, Hans Neubauer and 19 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinical application of circulating tumor cells.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Kiki C AndreeDepartment of Medical Cell BioPhysics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7807-6289
Anouk MentinkDepartment of Medical Cell BioPhysics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Leonie L ZeuneDepartment of Medical Cell BioPhysics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Leon W M M TerstappenDepartment of Medical Cell BioPhysics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Nikolas H StoeckleinDepartment of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Rui P NevesDepartment of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christiane DriemelDepartment of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Rita LampignanoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Liwen YangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Hans NeubauerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Tanja FehmDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Johannes C FischerInstitute for Transplantation Diagnostics and Cell Therapeutics, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Elisabetta RossiVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Mariangela ManiconeVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Umberto BassoVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Piero MarsonApheresis Unit, Blood Transfusion Service, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Rita ZamarchiVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6435-2257
Yohann LoriotDepartment of Medicine, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Valerie LapierreDepartment of Medicine, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Vincent FaugerouxINSERM U981 "Identification of Molecular Predictors and New Targets for Cancer Treatment", Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Marianne Oulhen"Circulating Tumor Cells" Translational Platform, CNRS UMS3655 - INSERM US23 Ammica, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Françoise FaraceINSERM U981 "Identification of Molecular Predictors and New Targets for Cancer Treatment", Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Gemma FowlerCancer Biomarkers, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
Mariane Sousa FontesProstate Cancer Targeted Therapies Group, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
Berni EbbsCancer Biomarkers, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
Maryou LambrosCancer Biomarkers, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
Mateus CrespoCancer Biomarkers, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
Penny FlohrCancer Biomarkers, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
Johann S de BonoProstate Cancer Targeted Therapies Group, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frequently, the number of circulating tumor cells (CTC) isolated in 7.5 mL of blood is too small to reliably determine tumor heterogeneity and to be representative as a "liquid biopsy". In the EU FP7 program CTCTrap, we aimed to validate and optimize the recently introduced Diagnostic LeukApheresis (DLA) to screen liters of blood. Here we present the results obtained from 34 metastatic cancer patients subjected to DLA in the participating institutions. About 7.5 mL blood processed with CellSearch® was used as "gold standard" reference. DLAs were obtained from 22 metastatic prostate and 12 metastatic breast cancer patients at four different institutions without any noticeable side effects. DLA samples were prepared and processed with different analysis techniques. Processing DLA using CellSearch resulted in a 0-32 fold increase in CTC yield compared to processing 7.5 mL blood. Filtration of DLA through 5 μm pores microsieves was accompanied by large CTC losses. Leukocyte depletion of 18 mL followed by CellSearch yielded an increase of the number of CTC but a relative decrease in yield (37%) versus CellSearch DLA. In four out of seven patients with 0 CTC detected in 7.5 mL of blood, CTC were detected in DLA (range 1-4 CTC). The CTC obtained through DLA enables molecular characterization of the tumor. CTC enrichment technologies however still need to be improved to isolate all the CTC present in the DLA.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLeukapheresisLiquid BiopsyMaleNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantCellSearchcirculating tumor cellsdiagnostic leukapheresisfiltrationliquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID30006930
PMCPMC6637919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.