Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30006862›Full record

Trial reportJournal of robotic surgery2019

A randomised trial to compare the increase in intracranial pressure as correlated with the optic nerve sheath diameter during propofol versus sevoflurane-maintained anesthesia in robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic surgery.

Nambiath Sujata, Raj Tobin, Ashwin Tamhankar, Gagan Gautam, Abdul Hamid Yatoo

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of robotic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Effects of prone positioning with neck extension on intracranial pressure according to optic nerve sheath diameter measured using ultrasound in children.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nambiath SujataDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Max Hospital, No. 1 Press Enclave Road, Saket, New Delhi, 110017, India. drnambiath@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8791-2357
Raj TobinDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Max Hospital, No. 1 Press Enclave Road, Saket, New Delhi, 110017, India.
Ashwin TamhankarDepartment of Uro-Oncology, Max Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Gagan GautamDepartment of Uro-Oncology, Max Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Abdul Hamid YatooDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Max Hospital, No. 1 Press Enclave Road, Saket, New Delhi, 110017, India.
Max Healthcare · INMax Super Speciality Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robot-assisted surgery can cause raised intracranial pressures (ICP) due to steep trendelenburg position and pneumoperitoneum. The choice of anesthetic agents can influence the ICP, which can be measured indirectly by correlating it with the sonographically measured optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). In this study, our primary aim was to compare the change from baseline of the ONSD during propofol versus sevoflurane-maintained anesthesia in patients undergoing robotic pelvic surgery. In this prospective, interventional, double-blinded study, we randomised 50 patients into two groups P and S. Subjects in group P received intravenous propofol infusion while those in group S received inhalation sevoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia. The ONSD at fixed intervals was noted as the mean of four values measured using ultrasound in both eyes by two independent anesthesiologists who were blinded to the group allocation. The patient demographics and baseline parameters were similar. The mean maximum rise in ONSD from baseline was 0.01 ± 0.01 cm in group P while it was 0.03 ± 0.01 cm in group S (p = 0.001). Percentage change from baseline in group P was 3.41 ± 1.81% and 8.00 ± 2.95% in group S (p = 0.001). We found a positive correlation between the duration of surgery and the maximum rise in ONSD in group S (p = 0.003), but not in group P. Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is more effective than inhalation sevoflurane in attenuating the increase in ICP as correlated with the ONSD during robotic pelvic surgery.Clinical trial registration: Yes; Principal investigator: Nambiath Sujata; Trial number: REF/2016/11/012713 (registered); Trial registry: CTRI- http://ctri.nic.in .

Indexed as

Anesthesia, InhalationAnesthesia, IntravenousIntracranial PressureLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdministration, InhalationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnestheticsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHead-Down TiltHumansInfusions, IntravenousAnestheticsPropofolSevofluraneAnesthesia agentIntracranial pressureOptic nerve sheath diameterRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID30006862
OpenAlexW2883610564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.