Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30006832›Full record

SynthesisUpdates in surgery2018

Augmented reality in open surgery.

Benish Fida, Fabrizio Cutolo, Gregorio di Franco, Mauro Ferrari, Vincenzo Ferrari

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Updates in surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Image Overlay Surgery Based on Augmented Reality: A Systematic Review.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. STTAR: Surgical Tool Tracking Using Off-the-Shelf Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Displays.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Using a novel three-dimensional holographic technology to perform open vascular surgery procedures.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mixed Reality Interfaces for Achieving Desired Views with Robotic X-ray Systems.Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Imaging & visualization · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benish FidaDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2736-4536
Fabrizio CutoloDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. fabrizio.cutolo@endocas.unipi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6773-3741
Gregorio di FrancoGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Translational and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2156-369X
Mauro FerrariDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, EndoCAS Center, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7042-0236
Vincenzo FerrariDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9294-2828

Funding

European Commission H2020 - Call ICT-29-2016 VOSTARS project 731974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) has been successfully providing surgeons an extensive visual information of surgical anatomy to assist them throughout the procedure. AR allows surgeons to view surgical field through the superimposed 3D virtual model of anatomical details. However, open surgery presents new challenges. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the available literature regarding the use of AR in open surgery, both in clinical and simulated settings. In this way, we aim to analyze the current trends and solutions to help developers and end/users discuss and understand benefits and shortcomings of these systems in open surgery. We performed a PubMed search of the available literature updated to January 2018 using the terms (1) "augmented reality" AND "open surgery", (2) "augmented reality" AND "surgery" NOT "laparoscopic" NOT "laparoscope" NOT "robotic", (3) "mixed reality" AND "open surgery", (4) "mixed reality" AND "surgery" NOT "laparoscopic" NOT "laparoscope" NOT "robotic". The aspects evaluated were the following: real data source, virtual data source, visualization processing modality, tracking modality, registration technique, and AR display type. The initial search yielded 502 studies. After removing the duplicates and by reading abstracts, a total of 13 relevant studies were chosen. In 1 out of 13 studies, in vitro experiments were performed, while the rest of the studies were carried out in a clinical setting including pancreatic, hepatobiliary, and urogenital surgeries. AR system in open surgery appears as a versatile and reliable tool in the operating room. However, some technological limitations need to be addressed before implementing it into the routine practice.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalModels, AnatomicVirtual RealityHumansLaparoscopyPubMedRoboticsSurgery, Computer-AssistedSurgical Procedures, OperativeAugmented realityImage-guided surgeryMixed realityOpen surgerySurgical navigation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.