Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30006753›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2018

Differential expression of E-cadherin and P-cadherin in pT3 prostate cancer: correlation with clinical and pathological features.

Catarina Ferreira, João Lobo, Luís Antunes, Paula Lopes, Carmen Jerónimo, Rui Henrique

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. E-cadherin clone 36 nuclear staining dictates adverse disease outcome in lobular breast cancer patients.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catarina FerreiraDepartment of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.
João LoboDepartment of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.
Luís AntunesDepartment of Epidemiology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.
Paula LopesDepartment of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.
Carmen JerónimoCancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, Research Center of Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (GEBC CI-IPOP), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.
Rui HenriqueDepartment of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal. henrique@ipoporto.min-saude.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3171-4666
Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil · PTUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/132751/2017Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, E.P.E. CI-IPOP-17-2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cadherins seem to play and important role in prostate cancer (PCa) progression. E-cadherin loss of expression has been associated with poor prognosis; P-cadherin's role is still elusive. Although pT3 PCa is often considered "high-risk cancer," it does not exhibit an uniformly poor prognosis. Herein, we assessed the prognostic value and survival impact of E-cadherin and P-cadherin immunoexpression in pT3 PCa. Radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens from 102 pT3 PCa patients treated between 1991 and 2014 in a single institution were designated for E-cadherin and P-cadherin immunoexpression analysis. A representative block from each specimen was selected for tissue micro-array (TMA) construction, using 3 cores per case. E-cadherin immunoexpression was assessed via a digital image analysis system. For P-cadherin, scoring criteria for HER2 in gastric cancer were used. Clinical records of all patients were reviewed for baseline clinical/pathologic characteristics and follow-up data. E-cadherin-low PCa patients displayed worse disease-specific survival (DSS), although not reaching statistical significance (HR 2.65, 95%CI 0.81-7.88). However, considering the pT3b group only, those with low E-cadherin immunoexpression displayed significantly worse overall-survival (OS) and DSS (HR 3.69, 95%CI 1.18-11.50; HR 5.90, 95%CI 1.40-24.81). No significant differences in survival were found for P-cadherin differential immunoexpression. Furthermore, an association between E-cadherin and P-cadherin immunoexpression (p = 0.019) was found, as among E-cadherin-low PCa, 96.6% were P-cadherin negative. We demonstrated that low E-cadherin immunoexpression discriminates among pT3b PCa patients those with poorer survival and which might benefit from specific therapy. The role of P-cadherin in PCa seems context-dependent deserving further investigation.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorCadherinsHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorCadherinsCDH1 protein, humanCDH3 protein, humanE-cadherinP-cadherinProstate cancerSurvival

Identifiers

PMID30006753
OpenAlexW2883544559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.