Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30006625›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

The Drosophila microbiome has a limited influence on sleep, activity, and courtship behaviors.

Joel Selkrig, Farhan Mohammad, Soon Hwee Ng, Jia Yi Chua, Tayfun Tumkaya, Joses Ho, Yin Ning Chiang, Dirk Rieger, Sven Pettersson, Charlotte Helfrich-Förster and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Biogenic action ofiScience · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Biomedicines · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Joel SelkrigSchool of Biological Sciences; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Farhan MohammadProgram in Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorders, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Soon Hwee NgTemasek Life Sciences Laboratory, Department of Biological Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jia Yi ChuaProgram in Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorders, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Tayfun TumkayaInstitute for Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore, 138673, Singapore.
Joses HoInstitute for Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore, 138673, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9186-6322
Yin Ning ChiangTemasek Life Sciences Laboratory, Department of Biological Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Dirk RiegerNeurobiology and Genetics, Theodor-Boveri Institute, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, 97074, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5597-5858
Sven PetterssonSchool of Biological Sciences; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Charlotte Helfrich-FörsterNeurobiology and Genetics, Theodor-Boveri Institute, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, 97074, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0859-9092
Joanne Y YewTemasek Life Sciences Laboratory, Department of Biological Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. jyew@hawaii.edu.
Adam Claridge-ChangProgram in Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorders, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. claridge-chang.adam@duke-nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0002-4583-3650

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In animals, commensal microbes modulate various physiological functions, including behavior. While microbiota exposure is required for normal behavior in mammals, it is not known how widely this dependency is present in other animal species. We proposed the hypothesis that the microbiome has a major influence on the behavior of the vinegar fly (Drosophila melanogaster), a major invertebrate model organism. Several assays were used to test the contribution of the microbiome on some well-characterized behaviors: defensive behavior, sleep, locomotion, and courtship in microbe-bearing, control flies and two generations of germ-free animals. None of the behaviors were largely influenced by the absence of a microbiome, and the small or moderate effects were not generalizable between replicates and/or generations. These results refute the hypothesis, indicating that the Drosophila microbiome does not have a major influence over several behaviors fundamental to the animal's survival and reproduction. The impact of commensal microbes on animal behaviour may not be broadly conserved.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalCourtshipDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGerm-Free LifeHost Microbial InteractionsLocomotionMaleMicrobiotaSleepSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID30006625
PMCPMC6045657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.