Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30006600›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Computational delineation and quantitative heterogeneity analysis of lung tumor on 18F-FDG PET for radiation dose-escalation.

Xiuying Wang, Hui Cui, Guanzhong Gong, Zheng Fu, Jianlong Zhou, Jiabing Gu, Yong Yin, Dagan Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Joint EANM/SNMMI/ESTRO practice recommendations for the use of 2-[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiuying WangBMIT research group, School of Information Technologies, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. xiu.wang@sydney.edu.au.
Hui CuiBMIT research group, School of Information Technologies, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Guanzhong GongThe Radiation Oncology Department of Shandong Cancer Hospital, Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Zheng FuPET/CT center, Shandong Tumor Hospital and Institute, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Jianlong ZhouData 61, CISRO, Sydney, Australia.
Jiabing GuThe Radiation Oncology Department of Shandong Cancer Hospital, Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yong YinThe Radiation Oncology Department of Shandong Cancer Hospital, Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China. yinyongsd@126.com.
Dagan FengBMIT research group, School of Information Technologies, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 81472811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative measurement and analysis of tumor metabolic activities could provide a more optimal solution to personalized accurate dose painting. We collected PET images of 58 lung cancer patients, in which the tumor exhibits heterogeneous FDG uptake. We design an automated delineation and quantitative heterogeneity measurement of the lung tumor for dose-escalation. For tumor delineation, our algorithm firstly separates the tumor from its adjacent high-uptake tissues using 3D projection masks; then the tumor boundary is delineated with our stopping criterion of joint gradient and intensity affinities. For dose-escalation, tumor sub-volumes with low, moderate and high metabolic activities are extracted and measured. Based on our quantitative heterogeneity measurement, a sub-volume oriented dose-escalation plan is implemented in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning system. With respect to manual tumor delineations by two radiation oncologists, the paired t-test demonstrated our model outperformed the other computational methods in comparison (p < 0.05) and reduced the variability between inter-observers. Compared to standard uniform dose prescription, the dosimetry results demonstrated that the dose-escalation plan statistically boosted the dose delivered to high metabolic tumor sub-volumes (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the doses received by organs-at-risk (OAR) including the heart, ipsilateral lung and contralateral lung were not statistically different (p > 0.05).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlgorithmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLungLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskPositron-Emission TomographyRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID30006600
PMCPMC6045640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.