ArticleScientific reports2018
Random Matrix Analysis for Gene Interaction Networks in Cancer Cells.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- An allometric prior enhances acoustic niche partitioning signal.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Article
- G2S3: A gene graph-based imputation method for single-cell RNA sequencing data.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Non-backtracking walks reveal compartments in sparse chromatin interaction networks.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Gene Saturation: An Approach to Assess Exploration Stage of Gene Interaction Networks.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Network spectra for drug-target identification in complex diseases: new guns against old foes.Applied network science · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Investigations of topological uniqueness of gene interaction networks in cancer cells are essential for understanding the disease. Although cancer is considered to originate from the topological alteration of a huge molecular interaction network in cellular systems, the theoretical study to investigate such complex networks is still insufficient. It is necessary to predict the behavior of a huge complex interaction network from the behavior of a finite size network. Based on the random matrix theory, we study the distribution of the nearest neighbor level spacings P(s) of interaction matrices of gene networks in human cancer cells. The interaction matrices are computed using the Cancer Network Galaxy (TCNG) database which is a repository of gene interactions inferred by a Bayesian network model. 256 NCBI GEO entries regarding gene expressions in human cancer cells have been used for the inference. We observe the Wigner distribution of P(s) when the gene networks are dense networks that have more than ~38,000 edges. In the opposite case, when the networks have smaller numbers of edges, the distribution P(s) becomes the Poisson distribution. We investigate relevance of P(s) both to the sparseness of the networks and to edge frequency factor which is the reliance (likelihood) of the inferred gene interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.