Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30006465›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Time-resolved neural reinstatement and pattern separation during memory decisions in human hippocampus.

Lynn J Lohnas, Katherine Duncan, Werner K Doyle, Thomas Thesen, Orrin Devinsky, Lila Davachi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Neural Representations of Reward-Related Memories Shift across Development.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. General knowledge and detailed memory benefit from different training sequences.Journal of applied research in memory and cognition · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Segregation-to-integration transformation model of memory evolution.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. How our understanding of memory replay evolves.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Predictive Representations in Hippocampal and Prefrontal Hierarchies.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lynn J LohnasDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003.
Katherine DuncanDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G3, Canada.
Werner K DoyleDepartment of Neurosurgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016.
Thomas ThesenDepartment of Physiology, Neuroscience, and Behavioral Sciences, St. George's University School of Medicine, St. George, Grenada, West Indies.
Orrin DevinskyDepartment of Neurology, Epilepsy Division, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016.
Lila DavachiDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; ld24@columbia.edu.
New York University · USColumbia University · USSt. George's University · GDUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Medial temporal lobe contributions to episodic memoryR01MH074692 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI DAVACHI, LILA · 2007 to 2021
$5.9M
Dynamics of episodic memory and event segmentationF32MH106266 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI LOHNAS, LYNN J · 2015 to 2017
$175k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH106266NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mnemonic decision-making has long been hypothesized to rely on hippocampal dynamics that bias memory processing toward the formation of new memories or the retrieval of old ones. Successful memory encoding may be best optimized by pattern separation, whereby two highly similar experiences can be represented by underlying neural populations in an orthogonal manner. By contrast, successful memory retrieval is thought to be supported by a recovery of the same neural pattern laid down during encoding. Here we examined how hippocampal pattern completion and separation emerge over time during memory decisions. We measured electrocorticography activity in the human hippocampus and posterior occipitotemporal cortex (OTC) while participants performed continuous recognition of items that were new, repeated (old), or highly similar to a prior item (similar). During retrieval decisions of old items, both regions exhibited significant reinstatement of multivariate high-frequency activity (HFA) associated with encoding. Further, the extent of reinstatement of encoding patterns during retrieval was correlated with the strength (HFA power) of hippocampal encoding. Evidence for encoding pattern reinstatement was also seen in OTC on trials requiring fine-grained discrimination of similar items. By contrast, hippocampal activity showed evidence for pattern separation during these trials. Together, these results underscore the critical role of the hippocampus in supporting both reinstatement of overlapping information and separation of similar events.

Indexed as

MemoryAdultDecision MakingElectrocorticographyFemaleHippocampusHumansMaleOccipital LobeYoung Adultelectrocorticographyhippocampusmemory reinstatementmnemonic discriminationpattern separation

Identifiers

PMID30006465
PMCPMC6077719
OpenAlexW2762196007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.