Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30006448›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2018

Physician uncertainty aversion impacts medical decision making for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results of a national survey.

Pierre Bories, Sébastien Lamy, Célestine Simand, Sarah Bertoli, Cyrille Delpierre, Sandra Malak, Luc Fornecker, Stéphane Moreau, Christian Récher, Antoine Nebout

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05865964 (Evaluation of Anthropological, Socio-cultural and Psychological Factors of Surgeons Practising in Oncology Which Condition Brakes in the Evaluation of Surgical Innovations), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05865964 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Anthropological, Socio-cultural and Psychological Factors of Surgeons Practising in Oncology Which Condition Brakes in the Evaluation of Surgical Innovations

TypeobservationalSponsorInstitut Claudius RegaudRan2022 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsSurgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Experiences of treatment decision-making among older newly diagnosed adults with acute myeloid leukemia: a qualitative descriptive study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Pierre BoriesRegional Cancer Network Onco-Occitanie, Toulouse University Institute of Cancer-Oncopole pierre.bories@onco-occitanie.fr.
Sébastien LamyINSERM Unit 1027, Faculty of Medicine, Toulouse.
Célestine SimandDepartment of Hematology, Strasbourg University Hospital.
Sarah BertoliDepartment of Hematology, Toulouse University Institute of Cancer-Oncopole.
Cyrille DelpierreINSERM Unit 1027, Faculty of Medicine, Toulouse.
Sandra MalakDepartment of Hematology, Rene Huguenin Hospital, Curie Institute, Saint-Cloud.
Luc ForneckerDepartment of Hematology, Strasbourg University Hospital.
Stéphane MoreauDepartment of Hematology, Limoges University Hospital.
Christian RécherDepartment of Hematology, Toulouse University Institute of Cancer-Oncopole.
Antoine NeboutINRA, UR 1303 ALISS, Ivry-sur-Seine, France.
Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FRAlimentation et Sciences Sociales · FRHôpital René Huguenin · FRUniversité de Limoges · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia can be treated with intensive chemotherapy, low-intensity therapy such as low-dose aracytine or hypomethylating agents, or best supportive care. The choice between these treatments is a function of many patient-related and disease-related factors. We investigated how physicians' behavioral characteristics affect medical decision-making between intensive and non-intensive therapy in this setting. A nationwide cross-sectional online survey of hematologists collected data on medical decision-making for 6 clinical vignettes involving older acute myeloid leukemia patients that were representative of routine practice. Questionnaires elicited physicians' demographic and occupational characteristics along with their individual behavioral characteristics according to a decision theory framework. From the pattern of responses to the vignettes, a K-means clustering algorithm was used to distinguish those who were likely to prescribe more intensive therapy and those who were likely to prescribe less intensive or no therapy. Multivariate analyses were used to identify physician's characteristics predictive of medical decision-making. We obtained 230 assessable answers, which represented an adjusted response rate of 45.4%. A multivariate model (n=210) revealed that physicians averse to uncertainty recommend significantly more intensive chemotherapy: Odds Ratio (OR) [95% Confidence Interval (CI)]: 1.15 [1.01;1.30];

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingSurveys and QuestionnairesUncertaintyAcute DiseaseAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLeukemia, MyeloidMaleMiddle AgedPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID30006448
PMCPMC6269286
OpenAlexW2884407192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.