Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30005719›Full record

ArticleOncology research2019

Efficacy and Safety of CalliSpheres

Yaohong Liu, Wensou Huang, Mingji He, Hui Lian, Yongjian Guo, Jingjun Huang, Jingwen Zhou, Kangshun Zhu

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yaohong LiuDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Wensou HuangDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Mingji HeDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Hui LianDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Yongjian GuoDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Jingjun HuangDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Jingwen ZhouDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Kangshun ZhuDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) treatment in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C liver cancer patients. In 39 patients with BCLC stage C liver cancer, after the first cycle of DEB-TACE, 2 (5.1%) and 24 (61.5%) patients achieved complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) to give an overall objective response rate (ORR) of 66.7%. With respect to the second cycle of therapy, the ORR was higher in patients receiving DEB-TACE compared with those receiving cTACE (57.1% vs. 11.1%). After the first cycle of DEB-TACE treatment, the percentages of abnormal albumin (ALB), total protein (TP), total bilirubin (TBIL), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) worsened at 1 week and recovered at 1 month. The number of patients with abnormal aspartate aminotransferase (AST) did not increase at 1 week but elevated at 1 month. After the second cycle of DEB-TACE or cTACE treatment, no difference was observed between cTACE and DEB-TACE in terms of all adverse events (AEs) at all visits, and most of the AEs did not change after the second cycle in both groups. The most common AEs after the first and second treatment cycles were pain, fever, and nausea/vomiting. These results demonstrate that DEB-TACE offers patients with BCLC stage C liver cancer a clinically active short-term treatment that is safe and relatively well tolerated.

Indexed as

Chemoembolization, TherapeuticMicrospheresAdultAgedAlanine TransaminaseAntineoplastic AgentsAspartate AminotransferasesCarcinoma, HepatocellularDoxorubicinDrug Delivery SystemsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedAlanine TransaminaseAntineoplastic AgentsAspartate AminotransferasesDoxorubicinpirarubicin

Identifiers

PMID30005719
PMCPMC7848450
OpenAlexW2883708295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.