Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30005679›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2018

Development of rapid guidelines: 3. GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist extension for rapid recommendations.

Rebecca L Morgan, Ivan Florez, Maicon Falavigna, Sergio Kowalski, Elie A Akl, Kristina A Thayer, Andrew Rooney, Holger J Schünemann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
18.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Molecular Diagnostic Testing (December 2023).Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Guideline
  8. Brazilian task force for the management of mucormycosis.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Guideline
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Rebecca L MorganDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact and McGRADE Center, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Room 2C16, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada.
Ivan FlorezDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact and McGRADE Center, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Room 2C16, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada.
Maicon FalavignaHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Sergio KowalskiDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact and McGRADE Center, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Room 2C16, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada.
Elie A AklDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact and McGRADE Center, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Room 2C16, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada.
Kristina A ThayerNational Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA), Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Division, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Andrew RooneyDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, P.O. Box 12233, Mail Drop K2-02, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, United States of America.
Holger J SchünemannDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact and McGRADE Center, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Room 2C16, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4K1, Canada. schuneh@mcmaster.ca.
Health Sciences Centre · CAMcMaster University · CAImpact · CAInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio Grande do Sul · BRNational Center for Environmental Assessment (EPA) · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Integrated Health Assessments for the National Toxicology ProgramZIAES103317 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ROONEY, ANDREW · 2016 to 2019
$24.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPractice guidelines require a substantial investment of resources and time, often taking between 1 and 3 years from conceptualisation to publication. However, urgent situations require the development of recommendations in a shorter timeframe. In this third and final article in the series exploring challenges and solutions in developing rapid guidelines (RGs), we propose guiding principles for the development of RGs.

methodsWe utilised the Guideline International Network-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist (GDC) as a starting point for elements to consider during RG development. We built on those elements using the findings from a systematic review of guideline manuals, a survey of international organisations conducting RGs, and interviews of guideline developers within WHO. We reviewed initial findings and developed an intermediate list of elements, as well as narrative guidance. We then invited experts to validate the intermediate list, reviewing for placement, brevity and redundancy. We used this iterative process and group consensus to determine the final elements for RG development guidance.

resultsOur work identified 21 principles within the topics of the Guideline International Network-McMaster GDC to guide the planning and development of RGs. Principles fell within 15 of the 18 checklist topics, highlighting strategies to streamline and expedite the guideline development process.

conclusionsWe defined principles to guide the development of RGs, while maintaining a standardised, rigorous and transparent process. These principles will serve as guidance for guideline developers responding to urgent situations such as public health urgencies. Integration of these principles within currently disseminated guideline development standards will facilitate the use of those tools in situations necessitating RG recommendations.

Indexed as

ChecklistDisease OutbreaksEmergenciesEvidence-Based MedicineInformation DisseminationPractice Guidelines as TopicPublic HealthAttitudeConsensusCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision MakingDelivery of Health CareHealth ResourcesHumansPolicy MakingQualitative ResearchClinical guidelinesGIN-McMaster Guideline ChecklistGuideline developmentRapid guidelines

Identifiers

PMID30005679
PMCPMC6043953
OpenAlexW2884033130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.