Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2018
Repeated vital sign measurements in the emergency department predict patient deterioration within 72 hours: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting deterioration of patients with early sepsis at the emergency department using continuous heart rate variability analysis: a model-based approach.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2023Trial
- Vital signs as biomarkers of early clinical deterioration in pediatric emergency departments: physiology, interpretation, and innovations: a narrative review.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Online Clinical Calculator for Predicting 28-Day Mortality in Older Adult Patients With Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy: Retrospective Study Using MIMIC-IV.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Early identification of high-risk patients admitted to emergency departments using vital signs and machine learning.World journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical validation of non-contact vital signs in an emergency department setting.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Article
- Serial measurements of SIRS and SEP scores to identify unique phenotypes of sepsis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Mortality rates among adult critical care patients with unusual or extreme values of vital signs and other physiological parameters: a retrospective study.Acute and critical care · 2024Article
- Article
- Trends in the national early warning score are associated with subsequent mortality - A prospective three-centre observational study with 11,331 general ward patients.Resuscitation plus · 2022Article
- National Early Warning Score and New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality or Transfer to the Intensive Care Unit in Emergency Department Patients with Suspected Bacterial Infections.Infection and drug resistance · 2022Article
- Early hemodynamic assessment using NICOM in patients at risk of developing Sepsis immediately after emergency department triage.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2021Observational
- Failure of vital sign normalization is more strongly associated than single measures with mortality and outcomes.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2020Article
- Article
- The Importance of Respiratory Rate Monitoring: From Healthcare to Sport and Exercise.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Prognostic Value of Severity Score Change for Septic Shock in the Emergency Room.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- A pilot study of respiratory rate derived from a wearable biosensor compared with capnography in emergency department patients.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMore than one in five patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with (suspected) infection or sepsis deteriorate within 72 h from admission. Surprisingly little is known about vital signs in relation to deterioration, especially in the ED. The aim of our study was to determine whether repeated vital sign measurements in the ED can differentiate between patients who will deteriorate within 72 h and patients who will not deteriorate.
methodsWe performed a prospective observational study in patients presenting with (suspected) infection or sepsis to the ED of our tertiary care teaching hospital. Vital signs (heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate and body temperature) were measured in 30-min intervals during the first 3 h in the ED. Primary outcome was patient deterioration within 72 h from admission, defined as the development of acute kidney injury, liver failure, respiratory failure, intensive care unit admission or in-hospital mortality. We performed a logistic regression analysis using a base model including age, gender and comorbidities. Thereafter, we performed separate logistic regression analyses for each vital sign using the value at admission, the change over time and its variability. For each analysis, the odds ratios (OR) and area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) were calculated.
resultsIn total 106 (29.5%) of the 359 patients deteriorated within 72 h from admission. Within this timeframe, 18.3% of the patients with infection and 32.9% of the patients with sepsis at ED presentation deteriorated. Associated with deterioration were: age (OR: 1.02), history of diabetes (OR: 1.90), heart rate (OR: 1.01), MAP (OR: 0.96) and respiratory rate (OR: 1.05) at admission, changes over time of MAP (OR: 1.04) and respiratory rate (OR: 1.44) as well as the variability of the MAP (OR: 1.06). Repeated measurements of heart rate and body temperature were not associated with deterioration.
conclusionsRepeated vital sign measurements in the ED are better at identifying patients at risk for deterioration within 72 h from admission than single vital sign measurements at ED admission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.