Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30005649›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2018

Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study.

Khurram Mustafa, Carolyn Czoski Murray, Emma Nicklin, Adam Glaser, Jacqueline Andrews

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Khurram MustafaLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK. khurram.mustafa@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1387-3201
Carolyn Czoski MurrayLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK.
Emma NicklinLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, Leeds, UK.
Adam GlaserUniversity of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology,, Leeds, UK.
Jacqueline AndrewsLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
University of Leeds · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChild Health research is reported to be at worryingly low level by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Recent survey showed that 54.5% of paediatric consultants in the United Kingdom do not do any research at all. We conducted a mixed methods study to understand barriers and facilitators for research involvement among paediatric trainees who are going to fill these consultant posts in the future.

methodsA questionnaire based on a validated index for research and development was completed by 136 paediatric trainees within a region in the North of England (Yorkshire and Humber). Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with stratified purposive sampling. Descriptive statistics and Chi-Square test for independence were used for quantitative analysis. Thematic content analysis was done for interviews based on analysis method framework.

results136 out of 396 trainees responded to the survey. There was a significant relationship between confidence in using research in practice and ability to understand research terminology. This was not related to research experience or training. Males were significantly more likely to have presented a research paper, know how research influences practice and have more confidence in using research in practice than females. There was no significant relationship between gender and research training or highest qualification. Time constraints and lack of academic culture were the most frequently mentioned barriers in the survey. Over-arching themes identified from the interviews were related to lack of academic culture, opportunities provided in current training scheme and constraints related to time availability along with workforce management.

conclusionPaediatric research requires a supportive academic culture with more flexibility in training scheme and immediate attention to a pressing staffing crisis.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchEnglandFemaleHumansMalePediatricsResearch ReportSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesTerminology as TopicUnited KingdomBarriers to researchChild health researchPaediatric researchPaediatricsResearch cultureSupportTrainingTraining scheme/pathway

Identifiers

PMID30005649
PMCPMC6044020
OpenAlexW2884755076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.