Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30005646›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

A hospital-wide evaluation of delirium prevalence and outcomes in acute care patients - a cohort study.

Maria Schubert, Roger Schürch, Soenke Boettger, David Garcia Nuñez, Urs Schwarz, Dominique Bettex, Josef Jenewein, Jasmina Bogdanovic, Marina Lynne Staehli, Rebecca Spirig and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nursing workload during delirium: a systematic literature review.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria SchubertNursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistr. 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland. maria.schubert@unibas.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-0382-9290
Roger SchürchClinical Trial Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Finkenhubelweg 11, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Soenke BoettgerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistr. 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
David Garcia NuñezDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistr. 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Urs SchwarzDivision of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistr. 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dominique BettexInstitute of Anesthesiology, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Josef JeneweinDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistr. 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jasmina BogdanovicNursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistr. 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Marina Lynne StaehliNursing Department, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Rebecca SpirigDirectorate of Nursing/MTT, Insel Gruppe, University Hospital Inselspital, Bern, Freiburgstr. 44a, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Alain RudigerInstitute of Anesthesiology, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Zurich · CHUniversitätsklinik Balgrist · CHUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelirium is a well-known complication in cardiac surgery and intensive care unit (ICU) patients. However, in many other settings its prevalence and clinical consequences are understudied. The aims of this study were: (1) To assess delirium prevalence in a large, diverse cohort of acute care patients classified as either at risk or not at risk for delirium; (2) To compare these two groups according to defined indicators; and (3) To compare delirious with non-delirious patients regarding hospital mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay, nursing hours and cost per case.

methodsThis cohort study was performed in a Swiss university hospital following implementation of a delirium management guideline. After excluding patients aged < 18 years or with a length of stay (LOS) < 1 day, 29'278 patients hospitalized in the study hospital in 2014 were included. Delirium period prevalence was calculated based on a Delirium Observation Scale (DOS) score ≥ 3 and / or Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) scores ≥4.

resultsOf 10'906 patients admitted, DOS / ICDSC scores indicated delirium in 28.4%. Delirium was most prevalent (36.2-40.5%) in cardiac surgery, neurosurgery, trauma, radiotherapy and neurology patients. It was also common in geriatrics, internal medicine, visceral surgery, reconstructive plastic surgery and cranio-maxillo-facial surgery patients (prevalence 21.6-28.6%). In the unadjusted and adjusted models, delirious patients had a significantly higher risk of inpatient mortality, stayed significantly longer in the ICU and hospital, needed significantly more nursing hours and generated significantly higher costs per case. For the seven most common ICD-10 diagnoses, each diagnostic group's delirious patients had worse outcomes compared to those with no delirium.

conclusionsThe results indicate a high number of patients at risk for delirium, with high delirium prevalence across all patient groups. Delirious patients showed significantly worse clinical outcomes and generated higher costs. Subgroup analyses highlighted striking variations in delirium period-prevalence across patient groups. Due to the high prevalence of delirium in patients treated in care centers for radiotherapy, visceral surgery, reconstructive plastic surgery, cranio-maxillofacial surgery and oral surgery, it is recommended to expand the current focus of delirium management to these patient groups.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCohort StudiesCritical CareDeliriumFemaleHospital MortalityHospitals, UniversityHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient AcuityPrevalenceRisk FactorsCost of diseases OR economic burden of diseasesDeliriumHospital mortalityLength of stayNeurocognitive disorders

Identifiers

PMID30005646
PMCPMC6045819
OpenAlexW2884365846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.