Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30005069›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

3D kidney segmentation from abdominal diffusion MRI using an appearance-guided deformable boundary.

Mohamed Shehata, Ali Mahmoud, Ahmed Soliman, Fahmi Khalifa, Mohammed Ghazal, Mohamed Abou El-Ghar, Moumen El-Melegy, Ayman El-Baz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. EARLY ASSESSMENT OF RENAL TRANSPLANTS USING BOLD-MRI: PROMISING RESULTS.Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohamed ShehataBioengineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America.
Ali MahmoudBioengineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America.
Ahmed SolimanBioengineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America.
Fahmi KhalifaDepartment of Electronics and Communications Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mohammed GhazalBioengineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America.
Mohamed Abou El-GharRadiology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt.
Moumen El-MelegyDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Ayman El-BazBioengineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7264-1323
University of Louisville · USMansoura University · EGAbu Dhabi University · AEAssiut University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new technique for more accurate automatic segmentation of the kidney from its surrounding abdominal structures in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is presented. This approach combines a new 3D probabilistic shape model of the kidney with a first-order appearance model and fourth-order spatial model of the diffusion-weighted signal intensity to guide the evolution of a 3D geometric deformable model. The probabilistic shape model was built from labeled training datasets to produce a spatially variant, independent random field of region labels. A Markov-Gibbs random field spatial model with up to fourth-order interactions was adequate to capture the inhomogeneity of renal tissues in the DW-MRI signal. A new analytical approach estimated the Gibbs potentials directly from the DW-MRI data to be segmented, in order that the segmentation procedure would be fully automatic. Finally, to better distinguish the kidney object from the surrounding tissues, marginal gray level distributions inside and outside of the deformable boundary were modeled with adaptive linear combinations of discrete Gaussians (first-order appearance model). The approach was tested on a cohort of 64 DW-MRI datasets with b-values ranging from 50 to 1000 s/mm2. The performance of the presented approach was evaluated using leave-one-subject-out cross validation and compared against three other well-known segmentation methods applied to the same DW-MRI data using the following evaluation metrics: 1) the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC); 2) the 95-percentile modified Hausdorff distance (MHD); and 3) the percentage kidney volume difference (PKVD). High performance of the new approach was confirmed by the high DSC (0.95±0.01), low MHD (3.9±0.76) mm, and low PKVD (9.5±2.2)% relative to manual segmentation by an MR expert (a board certified radiologist).

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAbdomenAdolescentAdultAlgorithmsChildFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalKidneyMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30005069
PMCPMC6044527
OpenAlexW2884235242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.