ArticlePloS one2018
3D kidney segmentation from abdominal diffusion MRI using an appearance-guided deformable boundary.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Consensus-based technical recommendations for clinical translation of renal diffusion-weighted MRI.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Pooled it
- Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Kidney: Design and Evaluation of a Reliable Processing Pipeline.Scientific reports · 2019Trial
- Deep-learning-based ensemble method for fully automated detection of renal masses on magnetic resonance images.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- STXBP3 and GOT2 predict immunological activity in acute allograft rejection.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Kidney segmentation in neck-to-knee body MRI of 40,000 UK Biobank participants.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- A DEEP LEARNING-BASED CAD SYSTEM FOR RENAL ALLOGRAFT ASSESSMENT: DIFFUSION, BOLD, AND CLINICAL BIOMARKERS.Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing · 2020Article
- A multimodal computer-aided diagnostic system for precise identification of renal allograft rejection: Preliminary results.Medical physics · 2020Article
- Relative Ectopic Kidney Function Quantification Using DMSA Tomoscintigraphy Modality.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2020Article
- Diffusion-weighted Renal MRI at 9.4 Tesla Using RARE to Improve Anatomical Integrity.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- EARLY ASSESSMENT OF RENAL TRANSPLANTS USING BOLD-MRI: PROMISING RESULTS.Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A new technique for more accurate automatic segmentation of the kidney from its surrounding abdominal structures in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is presented. This approach combines a new 3D probabilistic shape model of the kidney with a first-order appearance model and fourth-order spatial model of the diffusion-weighted signal intensity to guide the evolution of a 3D geometric deformable model. The probabilistic shape model was built from labeled training datasets to produce a spatially variant, independent random field of region labels. A Markov-Gibbs random field spatial model with up to fourth-order interactions was adequate to capture the inhomogeneity of renal tissues in the DW-MRI signal. A new analytical approach estimated the Gibbs potentials directly from the DW-MRI data to be segmented, in order that the segmentation procedure would be fully automatic. Finally, to better distinguish the kidney object from the surrounding tissues, marginal gray level distributions inside and outside of the deformable boundary were modeled with adaptive linear combinations of discrete Gaussians (first-order appearance model). The approach was tested on a cohort of 64 DW-MRI datasets with b-values ranging from 50 to 1000 s/mm2. The performance of the presented approach was evaluated using leave-one-subject-out cross validation and compared against three other well-known segmentation methods applied to the same DW-MRI data using the following evaluation metrics: 1) the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC); 2) the 95-percentile modified Hausdorff distance (MHD); and 3) the percentage kidney volume difference (PKVD). High performance of the new approach was confirmed by the high DSC (0.95±0.01), low MHD (3.9±0.76) mm, and low PKVD (9.5±2.2)% relative to manual segmentation by an MR expert (a board certified radiologist).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.