Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30004919›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2018

More Frequent Surveillance Following Lung Cancer Resection Is Not Associated With Improved Survival: A Nationally Representative Cohort Study.

Timothy L McMurry, George J Stukenborg, Larry G Kessler, Graham A Colditz, Melisa L Wong, Amanda B Francescatti, David R Jones, Jessica R Schumacher, Caprice C Greenberg, George J Chang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Interval of Computed Tomography Follow-Ups after Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Surgery Did Not Show Any Relationship with Survival.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Osteogenic and brain metastases after non-small cell lung cancer resection.International journal of clinical oncology · 2021
    Article
  15. Cost-Effectiveness of Surveillance Scanning Strategies after Curative Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021
    Article
  16. Routine follow-up after surgical treatment of lung cancer: is chest CT useful?Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Timothy L McMurryDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA.
George J StukenborgDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA.
Larry G KesslerDepartment of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Graham A ColditzDivisions of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Melisa L WongDivisions of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Amanda B FrancescattiCommission on Cancer and Cancer Programs, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL.
David R JonesThoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Jessica R SchumacherDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Caprice C GreenbergDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
George J ChangDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
David P WinchesterCommission on Cancer and Cancer Programs, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL.
Daniel P McKellarCommission on Cancer and Cancer Programs, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL.
Benjamin D KozowerDivisions of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
Collaborations and NCORP Collective ManagementUG1CA189823 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Evanthia Galanis, Olwen Hahn · 2014 to 2026
$120.6M
VARC CoreP30AG044281 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Louise C. Walter · 2013 to 2026
$19.9M
Institutional Career Development Core SupplementKL2TR001870 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KANAYA, ALKA M., SARKAR, URMIMALA · 2016 to 2025
$19.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001870NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189823NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044281Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute CE-1304-7279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate whether an association exists between the intensity of surveillance following surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and survival.

backgroundSurveillance guidelines following surgical resection of NSCLC vary widely and are based on expert opinion and limited evidence.

methodsA Special Study of the National Cancer Database randomly selected stage I to III NSCLC patients for data reabstraction. For patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2007 and followed for 5 years through 2012, registrars documented all postsurgical imaging with indication (routine surveillance, new symptoms), recurrence, new primary cancers, and survival, with 5-year follow-up. Patients were placed into surveillance groups according to existing guidelines (3-month, 6-month, annual). Overall survival and survival after recurrence were analyzed using Cox Proportional Hazards Models.

resultsA total of 4463 patients were surveilled with computed tomography scans; these patients were grouped based on time from surgery to first surveillance. Groups were similar with respect to age, sex, comorbidities, surgical procedure, and histology. Higher-stage patients received more surveillance. More frequent surveillance was not associated with longer risk-adjusted overall survival [hazard ratio for 6-month: 1.16 (0.99, 1.36) and annual: 1.06 (0.86-1.31) vs 3-month; P value 0.14]. More frequent imaging was also not associated with postrecurrence survival [hazard ratio: 1.02/month since imaging (0.99-1.04); P value 0.43].

conclusionsThese nationally representative data provide evidence that more frequent postsurgical surveillance is not associated with improved survival. As the number of lung cancer survivors increases over the next decade, surveillance is an increasingly important major health care concern and expenditure.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingSurvival AnalysisUnited States

Identifiers

PMID30004919
PMCPMC6419100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.