Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30004604›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2018

Structure-function multi-scale connectomics reveals a major role of the fronto-striato-thalamic circuit in brain aging.

Paolo Bonifazi, Asier Erramuzpe, Ibai Diez, Iñigo Gabilondo, Matthieu P Boisgontier, Lisa Pauwels, Sebastiano Stramaglia, Stephan P Swinnen, Jesus M Cortes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Amyloid-β and tau pathologies relate to distinctive brain dysconnectomics in preclinical autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paolo BonifaziBiocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
Asier ErramuzpeBiocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
Ibai DiezBiocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
Iñigo GabilondoBiocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
Matthieu P BoisgontierMovement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lisa PauwelsMovement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2033-8274
Sebastiano StramagliaDipartimento Interateneo di Fisica, Universita di Bari, and INFN, Sezione di Bari, Italy.
Stephan P SwinnenMovement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7173-435X
Jesus M CortesBiocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiological aging affects brain structure and function impacting morphology, connectivity, and performance. However, whether some brain connectivity metrics might reflect the age of an individual is still unclear. Here, we collected brain images from healthy participants (N = 155) ranging from 10 to 80 years to build functional (resting state) and structural (tractography) connectivity matrices, both data sets combined to obtain different connectivity features. We then calculated the brain connectome age-an age estimator resulting from a multi-scale methodology applied to the structure-function connectome, and compared it to the chronological age (ChA). Our results were twofold. First, we found that aging widely affects the connectivity of multiple structures, such as anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortices, basal ganglia, thalamus, insula, cingulum, hippocampus, parahippocampus, occipital cortex, fusiform, precuneus, and temporal pole. Second, we found that the connectivity between basal ganglia and thalamus to frontal areas, also known as the fronto-striato-thalamic (FST) circuit, makes the major contribution to age estimation. In conclusion, our results highlight the key role played by the FST circuit in the process of healthy aging. Notably, the same methodology can be generally applied to identify the structural-functional connectivity patterns correlating to other biomarkers than ChA.

Indexed as

Corpus StriatumNerve NetPrefrontal CortexThalamusAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAgingChildConnectomeDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansMiddle AgedYoung Adultbrain agebrain connectivitychronological agediffusion tensor imagingphysiological agingresting state

Identifiers

PMID30004604
PMCPMC6866396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.