Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30004429›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018

A Comparative Study of Four Kinds of Adaptive Decomposition Algorithms and Their Applications.

Tao Liu, Zhijun Luo, Jiahong Huang, Shaoze Yan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Application of EEG in migraine.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tao LiuState Key Laboratory of Tribology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China. liutao13@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn.
Zhijun LuoState Key Laboratory of Tribology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China. luozj16@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn.
Jiahong HuangState Key Laboratory of Tribology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China. jiahong-14@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-2921-1886
Shaoze YanState Key Laboratory of Tribology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China. yansz@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-2578-6831

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adaptive decomposition algorithm is a powerful tool for signal analysis, because it can decompose signals into several narrow-band components, which is advantageous to quantitatively evaluate signal characteristics. In this paper, we present a comparative study of four kinds of adaptive decomposition algorithms, including some algorithms deriving from empirical mode decomposition (EMD), empirical wavelet transform (EWT), variational mode decomposition (VMD) and Vold⁻Kalman filter order tracking (VKF_OT). Their principles, advantages and disadvantages, and improvements and applications to signal analyses in dynamic analysis of mechanical system and machinery fault diagnosis are showed. Examples are provided to illustrate important influence performance factors and improvements of these algorithms. Finally, we summarize applicable scopes, inapplicable scopes and some further works of these methods in respect of precise filters and rough filters. It is hoped that the paper can provide a valuable reference for application and improvement of these methods in signal processing.

Indexed as

adaptive decomposition algorithmnarrow-band signalnon-stationary signalsignal processing

Identifiers

PMID30004429
PMCPMC6068995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.