Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30004124›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2018

Central sensitization of the spino-parabrachial-amygdala pathway that outlasts a brief nociceptive stimulus.

Sarah A Kissiwaa, Elena E Bagley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah A KissiwaaDiscipline of Pharmacology and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Elena E BagleyDiscipline of Pharmacology and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3167-0707
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsChronic pain is disabling because sufferers form negative associations between pain and activities, such as work, leading to the sufferer limiting these activities. Pain information arriving in the amygdala is responsible for forming these associations and contributes to us feeling bad when we are in pain. Ongoing injuries enhance the delivery of pain information to the amygdala. If we want to understand why chronic pain can continue without ongoing injury, it is important to know whether this facilitation continues once the injury has healed. In the present study, we show that a 2 min noxious heat stimulus, without ongoing injury, is able to enhance delivery of pain information to the amygdala for 3 days. If the noxious heat stimulus is repeated, this enhancement persists even longer. These changes may prime this information pathway so that subsequent injuries may feel even worse and the associative learning that results in pain-related avoidance may be promoted. ABSTRACT: Pain is an important defence against dangers in our environment; however, some clinical conditions produce pain that outlasts this useful role and persists even after the injury has healed. The experience of pain consists of somatosensory elements of intensity and location, negative emotional/aversive feelings and subsequent restrictions on lifestyle as a result of a learned association between certain activities and pain. The amygdala contributes negative emotional value to nociceptive sensory information and forms the association between an aversive response and the environment in which it occurs. It is able to form this association because it receives nociceptive information via the spino-parabrachio-amygdaloid pathway and polymodal sensory information via cortical and thalamic inputs. Synaptic plasticity occurs at the parabrachial-amygdala synapse and other brain regions in chronic pain conditions with ongoing injury; however, very little is known about how plasticity occurs in conditions with no ongoing injury. Using immunohistochemistry, electrophysiology and behavioural assays, we show that a brief nociceptive stimulus with no ongoing injury is able to produce long-lasting synaptic plasticity at the rat parabrachial-amygdala synapse. We show that this plasticity is caused by an increase in postsynaptic AMPA receptors with a transient change in the AMPA receptor subunit, similar to long-term potentiation. Furthermore, this synaptic potentiation primes the synapse so that a subsequent noxious stimulus causes prolonged potentiation of the nociceptive information flow into the amygdala. As a result, a second injury could have an increased negative emotional value and promote associative learning that results in pain-related avoidance.

Indexed as

ampa receptoramygdalapainparabrachial nucleusSynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID30004124
PMCPMC6138295
OpenAlexW2889511659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.