ReviewJournal of molecular biology2018
Enabling Precision Medicine through Integrative Network Models.
Review in Journal of molecular biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Network Interactions of Circulating FGF23, HRG-HMGB1, and Cardiac Disease in CKD.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025Article
- A best-match approach for gene set analyses in embedding spaces.Genome research · 2024Article
- MOBILE pipeline enables identification of context-specific networks and regulatory mechanisms.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Integrated Pharmacogenetics Analysis of the Three Fangjis Decoctions for Treating Arrhythmias Based on Molecular Network Patterns.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Machine learning, the kidney, and genotype-phenotype analysis.Kidney international · 2020Review
- Precision medicine - networks to the rescue.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2020Review
- Personalized Network Modeling of the Pan-Cancer Patient and Cell Line Interactome.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2020Article
- ResponseNet v.3: revealing signaling and regulatory pathways connecting your proteins and genes across human tissues.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A key challenge in precision medicine lies in understanding molecular-level underpinnings of complex human disease. Biological networks in multicellular organisms can generate hypotheses about disease genes, pathways, and their behavior in disease-related tissues. Diverse functional genomic data, including expression, protein-protein interaction, and relevant sequence and literature information, can be utilized to build integrative networks that provide both genome-wide coverage as well as contextual specificity and accuracy. By carefully extracting the relevant signal in thousands of heterogeneous functional genomics experiments through integrative analysis, these networks model how genes work together in specific contexts to carry out cellular processes, thereby contributing to a molecular-level understanding of complex human disease and paving the way toward better therapy and drug treatment. Here, we discuss current methods to build context-specific integrative networks, focusing on tissue-specific networks. We highlight applications of these networks in predicting tissue-specific molecular response, identifying candidate disease genes, and increasing power by amplifying the disease signal in quantitative genetics data. Altogether, these exciting developments enable biomedical scientists to characterize disease from pathophysiology to cellular system and, finally, to specific gene alterations-making significant strides toward the goal of precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.