Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30003529›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2019

An Evaluation of the Information Sources of Cancer Patients' Relatives. A Prospective Survey.

Süleyman Yıldırım, Seher Nazlı Kazaz, Hüseyin Salih Semiz, Tuğba Yavuzşen, Işıl Somalı, Hülya Ellidokuz, İlhan Öztop

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessing Cancer Patients' Exposure to Treatment Misinformation.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. One Website to Gather them All: Usability Testing of the New German SKin Cancer INFOrmation (SKINFO) Website-A Mixed-methods Approach.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Süleyman YıldırımDr. Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey. deu.syldrm@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9856-3431
Seher Nazlı KazazDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey.
Hüseyin Salih SemizSchool of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, Inciralti, Izmir, Turkey.
Tuğba YavuzşenSchool of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, Inciralti, Izmir, Turkey.
Işıl SomalıSchool of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, Inciralti, Izmir, Turkey.
Hülya EllidokuzInstitute of Oncology, Department of Preventive Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, Inciralti, Izmir, Turkey.
İlhan ÖztopSchool of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, Inciralti, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients followed up with a cancer diagnosis must be well-informed about cancer to be able to cope with it. Besides, informing the relatives of the cancer patients who are also experiencing the same process about the diagnosis and follow-up period of cancer is highly important. In the current study, it was aimed to evaluate the information sources about cancer which are referred to by relatives of cancer patients. Three hundred ninety-one cancer patient relatives were included in medical oncology clinic between May 1 and June 30, 2015. A questionnaire was applied to the participants, comprising 12 questions to elicit demographic information and 11 questions about the information sources to which they referred. The study included 183 female and 208 male participants with a mean age of 47.9 ± 13.6 years. While the oncologists were the primary information sources referred to by 87%, the Internet was the second most preferred information source by 72%. The websites most frequently referred were the official websites (70%), the websites of oncology associations (53%), and social networks and forums (32%). The primary factors affecting the Internet preference were age, education level, income level, and place of residence. The Internet was the second most referred information source about cancer by family caregivers following oncologists. Therefore, it is of crucial importance that physicians inform patients and their relatives comprehensively as well as guiding them to correct and reliable information sources.

Indexed as

AgedCaregiversFamilyFemaleHumansInformation DisseminationInternetMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOncologistsProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAlternative information sourcesCancerFamily caregiverInternet

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.