ReviewJournal of general internal medicine2019
A Summary Report from the Research Partnership on Women in Science Careers.
Review in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pediatric subspecialty workforce: what is needed to secure its vitality and survival?Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Achieving gender equity in academic psychiatry - barriers to involvement and solutions for success.Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2024Article
- Innovations to address gender disparities and support the development of emergency medicine researchers.AEM education and training · 2024Article
- Inspiring and Preparing Our Future Leaders: Evaluating the Impact of the Early Career Women's Leadership Program.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2024Article
- Why Are There So Few Women Medical School Deans? Debunking the Myth That Shorter Tenures Drive Disparities.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2024Article
- The Role of Female Physicians in Psychosomatic Medicine: Opportunities and Challenges.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Brazilian women in Bioinformatics: Challenges and opportunities.Genetics and molecular biology · 2024Article
- Developing Priorities to Alleviate the Long-Term Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Women Engaged in Diabetes Research, Education, and Care: A Concept Mapping Study.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2023Article
- Lifting as we climb: Experiences and recommendations from women in neural engineering.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Acknowledging extraordinary women in the history of medical entomology.Parasites & vectors · 2022Review
- Research on Women's Health: Ready for the Future.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2022Article
- The Extent of Gender Gap in Citations in Ophthalmology Literature.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Experiences of Gender Inequity Among Women Physicians Across Career Stages: Findings from Participant Focus Groups.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Article
- Gender inequity and sexual harassment in the pharmacy profession: Evidence and call to action.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2021Article
- Prevalence of Discrimination, Abuse, and Harassment in Emergency Medicine Residency Training in the US.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Article
- Women in neuroscience: Where are we in 2019?Journal of neuroscience research · 2021Article
- Factors that Influence Work Family Conflict for Women Faculty.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2021Article
- Improving sex and gender identity equity and inclusion at conservation and ecology conferences.Nature ecology & evolution · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn response to the landmark report "Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering," the NIH Office of Research on Women's Health issued a request for applications that funded 14 R01 grants to investigate causal factors to career success for women in STEM. Following completion of the 4-year grants, the grant PIs formed a grassroots collaborative, the Research Partnership on Women in Science Careers.
objectiveTo summarize the work of the Research Partnership, which resulted in over 100 publications.
methodsWe developed six themes to organize the publications, with a "Best Practices" for each theme at the end of each section: Barriers to Career Advancement; Mentoring, Coaching, and Sponsorship; Career Flexibility and Work-Life Balance; Pathways to Leadership; Compensation Equity; and Advocating for Change and Stakeholder Engagement.
resultsWomen still contend with sexual harassment, stereotype threat, a disproportionate burden of family responsibilities, a lack of parity in compensation and resource allocation, and implicit bias. Strategies to address these barriers using the Bronfenbrenner ecological model at the individual, interpersonal, institutional, academic community, and policy levels include effective mentoring and coaching, having a strong publication record, addressing prescriptive gender norms, positive counter-stereotype imaging, career development training, networking, and external career programs such as the AAMC Early and Mid-Career Programs and Executive Leadership in Academic Medicine (ELAM).
conclusionsCultural transformation is needed to address the barriers to career advancement for women. Implementing the best practices noted of the work of the Research Partnership can help to achieve this goal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.