Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30003460›Full record

SynthesisJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2018

The efficacy and safety of electroanatomic mapping-guided endomyocardial biopsy: a systematic review.

Vaibhav R Vaidya, Anas A Abudan, Krithika Vasudevan, Ghanshyam Shantha, Leslie T Cooper, Suraj Kapa, Peter A Noseworthy, Yong-Mei Cha, Samuel J Asirvatham, Abhishek J Deshmukh

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intracardiac Echocardiography during Invasive Electrophysiological Procedures: a Scientific Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC, and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions of the ESC.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Redefining Cardiac Sarcoidosis with Advanced Imaging and Therapeutic Strategies.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  20. Cardiac magnetic resonance abnormalities in patients with acute myocarditis proven by septal endomyocardial biopsy.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vaibhav R VaidyaDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55906, USA.
Anas A AbudanDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55906, USA.
Krithika VasudevanDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55906, USA.
Ghanshyam ShanthaDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA, USA.
Leslie T CooperDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Suraj KapaDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55906, USA.
Peter A NoseworthyDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55906, USA.
Yong-Mei ChaDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55906, USA.
Samuel J AsirvathamDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55906, USA.
Abhishek J DeshmukhDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55906, USA. deshmukh.abhishek@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeElectroanatomic mapping (EAM) has been utilized as a modality to improve the sensitivity of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). We sought to systematically review published medical literature on the efficacy and safety of EAM-guided EMB.

methodsWe searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid CDR, Cochrane Central, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies where EAM was used for EMB. Data abstracted included demographics, indications, final diagnoses, histology findings, and technical details of biopsy extraction. Test characteristics including sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and area under curve (AUC) were calculated on a per-patient and per-biopsy level.

resultsSeventeen studies (9 case series, 8 case reports) were included in this systematic review. EAM-guided EMB was performed in 148 patients and results of 207 individual biopsies were available for analysis. The most common indications for EAM-guided EMB were suspected arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), myocarditis, and cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). The pooled sensitivity and specificity for EAM-guided EMB for the diagnosis of cardiomyopathies (ARVC, myocarditis, CS, and other specific diagnoses) were 92 and 58% on per-biopsy analysis and 100 and 39% on per-patient analysis. Among the individual components of abnormal EGMs, abnormal unipolar EGM had the best AUC on per-biopsy (0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.90) and per-patient analysis (0.84, 95% CI 0.68-0.92). EAM-guided EMB appears safe. Adverse events included 1 hemopericardium, 2 minimal asymptomatic pericardial effusions, and 1 femoral hematoma.

conclusionsEAM-guided EMB is a safe and efficacious method and might improve test characteristics over conventional fluoroscopy-guided biopsy.

Indexed as

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular DysplasiaBody Surface Potential MappingFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleMyocardiumPatient SafetyRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexArrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathyCardiac sarcoidosisElectroanatomical mappingEndomyocardial biopsyLymphocytic myocarditis

Identifiers

PMID30003460
OpenAlexW2835153775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.