Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30003407›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2019

Safety and feasibility of outpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Pooya Banapour, Peter Elliott, Ramzi Jabaji, Ashish Parekh, Apurba Pathak, Madhur Merchant, Kirk Tamaddon

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Predictors of failed same-day discharge in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a Canadian universal healthcare system.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Performing urological inpatient procedures as same-day procedures during the COVID pandemic A retrospective feasibility study.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Article
  8. First Canadian experience with same-day discharge after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Reducing postoperative opioid pill prescribing via a quality improvement approach.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Single-night stay for open radical prostatectomy.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pooya BanapourDepartment of Urology, Kaiser Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA. pooya.banapour@kp.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3844-1544
Peter ElliottDepartment of Urology, Kaiser Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
Ramzi JabajiDepartment of Urology, Kaiser Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
Ashish ParekhDepartment of Urology, Kaiser West Los Angeles Hospital, Los Angeles, USA.
Apurba PathakDepartment of Urology, Kaiser West Los Angeles Hospital, Los Angeles, USA.
Madhur MerchantDepartment of Urology, Kaiser West Los Angeles Hospital, Los Angeles, USA.
Kirk TamaddonDepartment of Urology, Kaiser West Los Angeles Hospital, Los Angeles, USA.
Los Angeles Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its inception, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has developed into a familiar surgical modality with improved perioperative outcomes including decreased hospital stay for localized prostate cancer patients. Experience with outpatient RARP has been reported as early as 2010. In this study, we evaluate the safety and feasibility of outpatient RARP by comparing perioperative outcomes between patients undergoing outpatient RARP to patients discharged on the day following surgery. This is a single-institution retrospective cohort study. Patients with localized disease who underwent RARP without pelvic lymph node dissection from September 2017 to January 2018 were included. T tests and Chi-squared analysis were used to compare demographic and perioperative characteristics of patients who were discharged on the same day of surgery (outpatient RARP) to patients discharged on the day after surgery (inpatient RARP). Of the 51 patients included in the study, 26 underwent outpatient RARP while 25 underwent inpatient RARP. There was no significant difference in mean age (61.4 vs 65.8 years, p = 0.05), BMI (27.1 vs 28.3 kg/m

Indexed as

OutpatientsPatient SafetyAgedAmbulatory CareCohort StudiesFeasibility StudiesHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomeOutpatient prostatectomyOutpatient robotic surgeryProstate cancerRobot-assisted radical prostatectomyRobotic prostatectomySafety of robotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID30003407
OpenAlexW2884193729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.