Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30003373›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2019

Update on the ICUD-SIU consultation on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in localised prostate cancer.

Eric Barret, Baris Turkbey, Philippe Puech, Matthieu Durand, Valeria Panebianco, Jurgen J Fütterer, Raphaële Renard-Penna, Olivier Rouvière

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Frontiers of Ultrasound Technology in Prostate Cancer Treatment.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Eric BarretDepartment of Urology, Institut Montsouris, Paris, France. eric.barret@imm.fr.
Baris TurkbeyMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Philippe PuechDepartment of Radiology, CHU Lille, University of Lille, Lille, France.
Matthieu DurandDepartment of Urology, CHU Nice, Nice, France.
Valeria PanebiancoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Jurgen J FüttererDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Raphaële Renard-PennaAcademic Department of Radiology, Hopital Tenon-Hopital Pitié-Salpétrière, AP-HP, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Paris, France.
Olivier RouvièreDepartment of Urinary and Vascular Imaging, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, University Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRInstitute Mutualiste Montsouris · FRNational Institutes of Health · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProstate cancer (PCa) imaging is a rapidly evolving field. Dramatic improvements in prostate MRI during the last decade will probably change the accuracy of diagnosis. This chapter reviews recent current evidence about MRI diagnostic performance and impact on PCa management. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe International Consultation on Urological Diseases nominated a committee to review the literature on prostate MRI. A search of the PubMed database was conducted to identify articles focussed on MP-MRI detection and staging protocols, reporting and scoring systems, the role of MP-MRI in diagnosing PCa prior to biopsy, in active surveillance, in focal therapy and in detecting local recurrence after treatment.

resultsDifferences in opinion were reported in the use of the strength of magnets [1.5 Tesla (T) vs. 3T] and coils. More agreement was found regarding the choice of pulse sequences; diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE MRI), and/or MR spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) are recommended in addition to conventional T2-weighted anatomical sequences. In 2015, the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS version 2) was described to standardize image acquisition and interpretation. MP-MRI improves detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in the repeat biopsy setting or before the confirmatory biopsy in patients considering active surveillance. It is useful to guide focal treatment and to detect local recurrences after treatment. Its role in biopsy-naive patients or during the course of active surveillance remains debated.

conclusionMP-MRI is increasingly used to improve detection of csPCa and for the selection of a suitable therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingContrast MediaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatic NeoplasmsContrast MediaMultiparametric MRIProstateProstate cancerProstate MRI

Identifiers

PMID30003373
OpenAlexW2838837894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.