Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30003349›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2019

A minimally invasive approach for peritonectomy procedures and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in limited peritoneal carcinomatosis: The American Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (ASPSM) multi-institution analysis.

A Arjona-Sanchez, J Esquivel, O Glehen, G Passot, K K Turaga, D Labow, S Rufian-Peña, R Morales, K van der Speeten

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Advances in the management of peritoneal malignancies.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

A Arjona-SanchezUnit of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery and CIBERehd, IMIBIC, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordova, Spain.
J EsquivelDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Frederick Memorial Hospital, 7211 Bank Court, Suite 200, Frederick, MD, USA. jesusesquivel@yahoo.com.
O GlehenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Benite, France.
G PassotDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Benite, France.
K K TuragaSection of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
D LabowDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
S Rufian-PeñaUnit of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery and CIBERehd, IMIBIC, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordova, Spain.
R MoralesUnit of Surgical Oncology, Hospital son Spaces, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
K van der SpeetenDepartment of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Hôpital Lyon Sud · FRCalvert Memorial Hospital · USCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas · ESHasselt University · BEInstituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba · ESMount Sinai Medical Center · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMinimally invasive surgery is playing an increasing role in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal and gynaecological malignancies as the data show reduced morbidity, faster recovery and similar oncological outcome when compared to open procedures. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe American Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (ASPSM) conducted a retrospective study to analyse peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC done via the laparoscopic route. A database with standard clinical and pathological parameters was set up and distributed amongst ASPSM members. Rate of relapse, morbidity and mortality were the primary endpoints of the study.

resultsA total of 90 patients from 7 centres around the world were identified. Sixty percent were female. Mean age was 50 years. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal origin was the most common diagnosis in a 64.9% of patients and colon origin was diagnosed in 16.5% of patients. Mean peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 4.1 (0-10). Forty-one percent of patients had a bowel resection. Mean operative time was 4.7 h (2.5-8). All patients had a complete cytoreduction and HIPEC. Grade 3 and 4 morbidity was 3.0 and 6.5%, respectively. The most common reason for re-operation was an internal hernia in 2 out of 5 cases. Operative mortality and re-admission rates were 0 and 5%, respectively. Mean hospital stay was 7.4 days (1-18). At a mean follow-up of 31.6 months, 15/90 patients have a disease relapse but loco-regional relapse was identified in only five patients.

conclusionsAnalysis of these data suggests that minimally invasive approach for peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC is feasible, safe and should be considered as part of the armamentarium for highly selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancies with limited tumour burden, defined as PCI of 10 or less and borderline tumours as low-grade pseudomyxoma and benign multicystic mesothelioma.

Indexed as

Hyperthermia, InducedLaparoscopyPeritoneal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesCytoreductive surgery (CRS)Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)Laparoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID30003349
OpenAlexW2865249705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.