ArticleSurgical endoscopy2019
A minimally invasive approach for peritonectomy procedures and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in limited peritoneal carcinomatosis: The American Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (ASPSM) multi-institution analysis.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic-assisted cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): a minimally invasive approach for peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with low burden disease.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Robotic versus open cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a propensity score-matched study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: comparable with the open approach for limited colorectal peritoneal metastases (KNUCRC-25CR1).Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Gallbladder Cancer and Peritoneal Metastasis: Is there any role of Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and/or Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)? A Narrative Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Review
- Educational Review: Updates on Therapeutic Strategies for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Robotic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: is there a benefit?Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Outcomes of minimal access cytoreductive surgery (M-CRS) and HIPEC/EPIC vs. open cytoreductive surgery (O-CRS) and HIPEC/EPIC in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies: a meta-analysis.Pleura and peritoneum · 2024Review
- Laparoscopic versus open approach for interval cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a matched comparative study.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- An Asian Tertiary Centre's Early Experience with Laparoscopic Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Learning curve for minimal invasive cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) procedures.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Outcomes of Laparoscopic Optimal Interval Cytoreduction Surgery (LOICS) in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancers Having Low Burden Disease.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Review
- Advances in the management of peritoneal malignancies.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is associated with improved perioperative outcomes: a single-center early experience propensity-matched analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in LAMN with small volume of peritoneal disease: a valuable option of treatment for good patient-related experience measures (PREMs).Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Current Trends in Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Peritoneal Disease from Appendiceal and Colorectal Malignancies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC: a comparative matched analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Complete laparoscopic pelvic peritonectomy plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.Techniques in coloproctology · 2020Article
- Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy by laparoscopy via a single-port approach for low-grade peritoneal malignancy.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Single-Port Laparoscopic Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.The American journal of case reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMinimally invasive surgery is playing an increasing role in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal and gynaecological malignancies as the data show reduced morbidity, faster recovery and similar oncological outcome when compared to open procedures. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe American Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (ASPSM) conducted a retrospective study to analyse peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC done via the laparoscopic route. A database with standard clinical and pathological parameters was set up and distributed amongst ASPSM members. Rate of relapse, morbidity and mortality were the primary endpoints of the study.
resultsA total of 90 patients from 7 centres around the world were identified. Sixty percent were female. Mean age was 50 years. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal origin was the most common diagnosis in a 64.9% of patients and colon origin was diagnosed in 16.5% of patients. Mean peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 4.1 (0-10). Forty-one percent of patients had a bowel resection. Mean operative time was 4.7 h (2.5-8). All patients had a complete cytoreduction and HIPEC. Grade 3 and 4 morbidity was 3.0 and 6.5%, respectively. The most common reason for re-operation was an internal hernia in 2 out of 5 cases. Operative mortality and re-admission rates were 0 and 5%, respectively. Mean hospital stay was 7.4 days (1-18). At a mean follow-up of 31.6 months, 15/90 patients have a disease relapse but loco-regional relapse was identified in only five patients.
conclusionsAnalysis of these data suggests that minimally invasive approach for peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC is feasible, safe and should be considered as part of the armamentarium for highly selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancies with limited tumour burden, defined as PCI of 10 or less and borderline tumours as low-grade pseudomyxoma and benign multicystic mesothelioma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.