ArticleSurgical endoscopy2019
Autologous blood, a novel agent for preoperative colonic localization: a safety and efficacy comparison study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Improved lymph node detection in minimally invasive radical surgery for colorectal cancer using nanocarbon tracer.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Safety and efficacy of autologous blood tattooing for preoperative colonic localization: a comparative study with conventional India ink tattooing.Techniques in coloproctology · 2024Article
- To what extent does endoscopic tattooing marking boost lymph node retrieval?Annals of coloproctology · 2023Article
- Preoperative tumor marking with indocyanine green (ICG) prior to minimally invasive colorectal cancer: a systematic review of current literature.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
- CT guided autologous blood localization of pulmonary ground glass nodules for video assisted thoracoscopic surgery compared to micro-coil localization.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Clip-Detector Using a Neodymium Magnet to Locate Malignant Tumors during Laparoscopic Surgery.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Autologous blood for preoperative colorectal TUMOR'S localization: A Vietnamese preliminary experience.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Preoperative tumor marking with indocyanine green prior of robotic colorectal resections.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Preoperative Colonoscopic Tattooing Using a Direct Injection Method with Indocyanine Green for Localization of Colorectal Tumors: An Efficacy and Safety Comparison Study.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2020Article
- Preoperative Colonoscopic Tattooing with Autologous Blood in Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Red-Flagging for an Invisible Enemy.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2020Article
- The Usefulness of Preoperative Colonoscopic Tattooing with Autologous Blood for Localization in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreoperative localization is essential for minimally invasive colorectal surgery. However, conventional endoscopic tattooing agents such as India ink have safety issues. The availability of new endoscopic markers such as non-India-ink-based agent is limited. We assessed the efficacy and safety of preoperative endoscopic tattooing using autologous blood in colorectal surgery.
methodsFrom February 2016, all patients who required localization of a target lesion before colorectal surgery underwent endoscopic tattooing using autologous blood, and the outcomes were collected prospectively. As a comparison, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of a further 51 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic tattooing using India ink before February 2016. A total of 102 patients who underwent endoscopic tattooing using either India ink or autologous blood were included in this study. The primary outcomes were the visibility of the tattooing in the peritoneal cavity and related adverse events.
resultsEndoscopic tattoos produced using India ink were visible in 49 (96.1%) patients, and tattoos created using autologous blood were visible in 47 (92.2%) patients. In the autologous blood group, the tattoo could not be identified in four patients due to excessive peritoneal fat, bleeding tendency, congenital anomaly, and suboptimal tattooing. Seven (13.7%) patients in the India ink group and three (5.9%) patients in the autologous blood group experienced endoscopic tattooing-related adverse events.
conclusionsAutologous blood is a feasible and safe tattooing agent for preoperative endoscopic localization of colorectal lesions within maximal interval of 5 days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.