Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30003341›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2019

Disparities in health-related quality of life in women undergoing treatment for advanced ovarian cancer: the role of individual-level and contextual social determinants.

Jennifer L Moss, Jeanne Murphy, Virginia L Filiaci, Lari B Wenzel, Lori Minasian, Sarah M Temkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Physical and functional well-being and symptoms of ovarian cancer in women undergoing first-line of chemotherapy: a one-year follow-up.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Epidemiology and Implementation of Cancer Prevention in Disparate Populations and Settings.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer L MossNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3794-1344
Jeanne MurphyGeorge Washington University School of Nursing, Washington, DC, USA.
Virginia L FiliaciRoswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Lari B WenzelUniversity of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Lori MinasianNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sarah M TemkinMassey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA, USA. sarah.temkin@vcuhealth.org.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSocial determinants may influence health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among women with ovarian cancer, potentially creating disparities in clinical outcomes. We investigated the relationship between HRQOL and social determinants of health, including travel distance to access cancer care and health insurance type, among women participating in a randomized trial of primary adjuvant treatment for advanced ovarian cancer.

methodsThe Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian (FACT-O) questionnaire captured HRQOL (physical well-being, functional well-being, ovarian-specific, and trial outcome index [TOI]) prior to chemotherapy (baseline), during the trial, and 84 weeks after initiation of chemotherapy for women with advanced epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. We constructed bivariate and multivariable linear mixed effects models examining the associations of social determinants of health (individual-level and contextual factors) with HRQOL scores at 84 weeks, clustering participants (n = 993) within treatment centers, and Census regions and controlling for baseline HRQOL.

resultsMost individual-level (race, age, cancer stage, adverse events) and contextual (travel distance to treatment center, community socioeconomic status) factors were not statistically significantly associated with HRQOL. Compared to participants with private health insurance, other participants had lower mean HRQOL (physical well-being: public insurance, - 1.00 (standard error[SE] = 0.49) points, uninsured, - 1.93 (SE = 0.63) points; functional well-being: public, - 1.29 (SE = 0.59), uninsured, - 1.98 (SE = 0.76); ovarian cancer-specific: public, - 1.60 (SE = 0.59), uninsured, - 1.66 (SE = 0.75); TOI: public, - 3.81 (SE = 1.46), uninsured, - 5.51 (SE = 1.86); all p < .05).

conclusionsPrivate health insurance was associated with improved HRQOL at the completion of treatment for advanced stage ovarian cancer. Implications of health insurance on HRQOL should be further investigated, particularly among women with ovarian cancer who receive standard of care treatment.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesQuality of LifeSocial Determinants of HealthAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialDisease ProgressionFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIndividualityInsurance, HealthMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsCommunity healthHealth insuranceHealth-related quality of lifeOvarian cancerSocial determinants of healthTravel distance

Identifiers

PMID30003341
PMCPMC6330149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.