Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30003332›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2019

Postprandial metabolic responses to ingestion of bovine glycomacropeptide compared to a whey protein isolate in prediabetic volunteers.

Anja S Hoefle, Adina M Bangert, Manuela J Rist, Kurt Gedrich, Yu-Mi Lee, Thomas Skurk, Jürgen Danier, Uwe Schwarzenbolz, Hannelore Daniel

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anja S HoefleNutritional Physiology, Technical University of Munich, Gregor-Mendel-Str. 2, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Adina M BangertNutritional Physiology, Technical University of Munich, Gregor-Mendel-Str. 2, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Manuela J RistNutritional Physiology, Technical University of Munich, Gregor-Mendel-Str. 2, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Kurt GedrichNutritional Physiology, Technical University of Munich, Gregor-Mendel-Str. 2, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Yu-Mi LeeNutritional Physiology, Technical University of Munich, Gregor-Mendel-Str. 2, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Thomas SkurkElse Kröner-Fresenius Center of Nutritional Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Gregor-Mendel-Str. 2, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Jürgen DanierBioanalytik Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Alte Akademie 10, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Uwe SchwarzenbolzProfessur für Lebensmittelchemie, Technische Universität Dresden, Bergstr. 66, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Hannelore DanielNutritional Physiology, Technical University of Munich, Gregor-Mendel-Str. 2, 85354, Freising, Germany. hannelore.daniel@tum.de.
Technical University of Munich · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DETU Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhey protein was shown to reduce blood glucose responses in humans and various other positive effects have been attributed to this protein. In contrast, studies using glycomacropeptide (GMP) as part of the whey fraction of bovine milk are rare. We, therefore, studied the postprandial responses to GMP administration in humans with impaired glucose tolerance compared to the effects of pure whey protein in a random design.

methodsFifteen prediabetic volunteers received on different occasions one of three test drinks containing 50 g of maltodextrin19 (MD19) alone or in combination with either 50 g GMP or 50 g whey protein isolate (WPI). Blood was collected over 4 h with analysis of blood glucose and hormones, gastric emptying rate as well as plasma amino- and fatty acids, β-hydroxybutyrate and acylcarnitines.

resultsThe WPI drink reduced the AUC of venous blood glucose compared to the MD19 drink in the prediabetic group by 11% (p = 0.0018) whereas GMP reduced the AUC by 18% (p < 0.0001), significantly different to the WPI drink (p = 0.0384). The reduction in blood glucose after the GMP drink was accompanied by a significantly lower AUC of insulin (- 34%) than for the WPI drink. Levels of C-peptide and of glucose insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) were highly increased after the WPI drink over the MD19 control drink but remained in essence unaffected by the GMP.

conclusionGMP reduced the glycemic response more potently than whey protein, whereas insulin output was less affected making GMP an interesting protein to control postprandial glucose responses.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood GlucoseCaseinsCattleCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeptide FragmentsPostprandial PeriodPrediabetic StateWhey ProteinsBlood GlucosecaseinomacropeptideCaseinsPeptide FragmentsWhey ProteinsGlucoseGlycomacropeptideGMPInsulinPrediabetesWhey protein

Identifiers

PMID30003332
OpenAlexW2843957870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.