Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30003311›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2018

Prevalence rates, reporting, and psychosocial correlates of stalking victimization: results from a three-sample cross-sectional study.

Matt R Nobles, Robert J Cramer, Samantha A Zottola, Sarah L Desmarais, Tess M Gemberling, Sarah R Holley, Susan Wright

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Measuring stalking: the development and evaluation of the Stalking Assessment Indices (SAI).Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Matt R NoblesUniversity of Central Florida, 12805 Pegasus Dr., Orlando, FL, 32816, USA. mnobles@ucf.edu.
Robert J CramerOld Dominion University, 1014 W. 46th St., Norfolk, VA, 23509, USA.
Samantha A ZottolaNorth Carolina State University, 2310 Stinson Rd. Poe Hall 640, Raleigh, NC, 27685, USA.
Sarah L DesmaraisNorth Carolina State University, 2310 Stinson Rd. Poe Hall 640, Raleigh, NC, 27685, USA.
Tess M GemberlingUniversity of Alabama, 505 Hackberry Ln, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA.
Sarah R HolleySan Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave., EP 301, San Francisco, CA, 94132, USA.
Susan WrightNational Coalition for Sexual Freedom, 822 Guilford Ave., #127, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA.
North Carolina State University · USOld Dominion University · USSan Francisco State University · USUniversity of Alabama · USUniversity of Central Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePublic health and criminal justice stalking victimization data collection efforts are plagued by subjective definitions and lack of known psychosocial correlates. The present study assesses the question of stalking victimization prevalence among three groups. Psychosocial risk and protective factors associated with stalking victimization experiences were assessed.

methodsArchival data (n = 2159) were drawn from a three-sample (i.e., U.S. nationwide sexual diversity special interest group, college student, and general population adult) cross-sectional survey of victimization, sexuality, and health.

resultsThe range of endorsement of stalking-related victimization experiences was 13.0-47.9%. Reported perpetrators were both commonly known and unknown persons to the victim. Participants disclosed the victimization primarily to nobody or a family member/friend. Bivariate correlates of stalking victimization were female gender, Associates/Bachelor-level education, bisexual or other sexual orientation minority status, hypertension, diabetes, older age, higher weekly drug use, elevated trait aggression, higher cognitive reappraisal skills, lower rape myth acceptance, and elevated psychiatric symptoms. Logistic regression results showed the strongest factors in identifying elevated stalking victimization risk were: older age, elevated aggression, higher cognitive reappraisal skills, lesser low self-control, increased symptoms of suicidality and PTSD re-experiencing, and female and other gender minority status.

conclusionsBehavioral approaches to epidemiological and criminal justice stalking victimization are recommended. Victimization under reporting to healthcare and legal professionals were observed. Further research and prevention programming is needed to capitalize on data concerning personality and coping skills, sexual diversity, and trauma-related psychiatric symptoms.

Indexed as

DisclosureAdolescentAdultAggressionCrime VictimsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFriendsHumansLogistic ModelsMalePrevalenceSexual and Gender MinoritiesStalkingStudentsUnited StatesBDSMLGBTQMental healthPersonalityStalkingVictimization

Identifiers

PMID30003311
OpenAlexW2881495992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.