Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30003260›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2018

Anthropomorphic Model of Intrathecal Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics Within the Spinal Subarachnoid Space: Spinal Cord Nerve Roots Increase Steady-Streaming.

Mohammadreza Khani, Lucas R Sass, Tao Xing, M Keith Sharp, Olivier Balédent, Bryn A Martin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammadreza KhaniNeurophysiological Imaging and Modeling Laboratory, Department of Biological Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844 e-mail: .
Lucas R SassNeurophysiological Imaging and Modeling Laboratory, Department of Biological Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844 e-mail: .
Tao XingDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844 e-mail: .
M Keith SharpBiofluid Mechanics Laboratory, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292 e-mail: .
Olivier BalédentBioflow Image, CHU Nord Amiens-Picardie, Amiens 80054, France e-mail: .
Bryn A MartinNeurophysiological Imaging and Modeling Laboratory, Department of Biological Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844 e-mail: .
University of Idaho · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRUniversity of Louisville · US

Funding

Tracking and EvaluationU54GM104944 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS · PI WARD, TONY JOHN · 2013 to 2023
$39.6M
Highly Accelerated Simultaneous Multi-Slice Phase Contrast MRIR44MH112210 · NIMH · ADVANCED MRI TECHNOLOGY, LLC · PI FEINBERG, DAVID ALAN · 2016 to 2017
$2.7M
National Institute of General Medical Sciences U54 GM104944National Institute of Mental Health R44 MH112210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics are thought to play a vital role in central nervous system (CNS) physiology. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of spinal cord (SC) nerve roots (NR) on CSF dynamics. A subject-specific computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of the complete spinal subarachnoid space (SSS) with and without anatomically realistic NR and nonuniform moving dura wall deformation was constructed. This CFD model allowed detailed investigation of the impact of NR on CSF velocities that is not possible in vivo using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or other noninvasive imaging methods. Results showed that NR altered CSF dynamics in terms of velocity field, steady-streaming, and vortical structures. Vortices occurred in the cervical spine around NR during CSF flow reversal. The magnitude of steady-streaming CSF flow increased with NR, in particular within the cervical spine. This increase was located axially upstream and downstream of NR due to the interface of adjacent vortices that formed around NR.

Indexed as

HydrodynamicsModels, AnatomicCerebrospinal FluidFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPatient-Specific ModelingSpinal Nerve RootsSubarachnoid SpaceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30003260
PMCPMC6056198
OpenAlexW2804841099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.