Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30003189›Full record

ReviewAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2018

p53 molecular approach to diagnosis and treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Hideaki Shimada

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Impact of High Immunoreactivity on Surgically Treated Serum p53 Antibody-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Multi-Institutional Study of 637 Cases.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparison between a new assay system, ElecsysMolecular and clinical oncology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hideaki ShimadaDepartment of Surgery Toho University Graduate School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1990-8217
Toho University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We reviewed our research concerning p53 molecules in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by focusing on the p53 molecular diagnosis and treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. First, we developed diagnostic tools to analyze serum p53 autoantibodies to detect esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Positive rate was around 25% to 30% in all patients and around 20% even in stage I patients. Presence of serum p53 antibodies was significantly associated with overexpression of p53 protein in tumor cells. Seropositive patients were more likely than seronegative patients to be resistant to chemotherapy. Monitoring of the titer of serum p53 autoantibodies was useful in predicting patients at high risk of recurrence and/or treatment response. Second, using Ad5CMV-p53 for 10 patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, we carried out a phase I/II study of adenoviral-mediated p53 gene therapy. Although no complete response was observed, local tumor was stabilized in nine patients. No serious adverse events related to Ad5CMV-

Indexed as

autoantibodyesophageal cancergene therapyp53squamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID30003189
PMCPMC6036386
OpenAlexW2808119561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.