Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30003173›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2018

Main changes in European Clinical Trials Regulation (No 536/2014).

E Tenti, G Simonetti, M T Bochicchio, G Martinelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Clinical trials.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ethical review of patient safety and public health in EU clinical trials legislation: impact of COVID-19 pandemic.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E TentiIstituto di Ematologia L. and E. Seragnoli, University of Bologna, Italy.
G SimonettiIstituto di Ematologia L. and E. Seragnoli, University of Bologna, Italy.
M T BochicchioIstituto di Ematologia L. and E. Seragnoli, University of Bologna, Italy.
G MartinelliIstituto di Ematologia L. and E. Seragnoli, University of Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The new Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014 for clinical trials of medicinal products for human is part of a European regulatory framework in which the European Commission has wished to give a strong impetus to scientific research and industrial progress. It is a new regulation that fills a series of regulatory gaps in the Clinical Trials through the creation of a uniform framework for the authorization of clinical trials by all interested Member States with a single assessment of the results. The Regulation thus facilitates cross-border cooperation to make the clinical tests wider and encourage the development of special treatments, for example for rare diseases, but above all streamlines the rules on clinical trials across European Union (EU), introducing simplified rules for experimentation so-called 'low level of intervention', on which much has been discussed and still arouses concern, providing for authorized medicines or used off-label in the presence of scientific evidence published on efficacy and safety and to benefit from they will be mainly the pediatric and oncological therapeutic areas. The applications and any communication will be submitted paperlessly via a new electronic EU portal. The complex processing procedures and shorter time limits are to be stressed in comparison to the previously valid regulations. This is a major challenge for all stakeholders, but on the other hand it should contribute to the future role of the EU in the development of innovative medicines.

Indexed as

CI, Informed ConsentClinical trialsEC, European CommissionEU, European UnionInterventional studyMA, Marketing authorizationMS, member statesNew regulationReporting member statesrMS, reporting member state

Identifiers

PMID30003173
PMCPMC6039537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.