ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2018
Comparison of treatment effects between four premolar extraction and total arch distalization using the modified C-palatal plate.
Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04814173 (Evaluation of the Efficacy of One-jaw Versus Tow-jaw Mechanics for Mini-implants Anchored Total-maxillary-arch-distalization in the Treatment of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion A Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Efficacy of One-jaw Versus Tow-jaw Mechanics for Mini-implants Anchored Total-maxillary-arch-distalization in the Treatment of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The effectiveness of the total-maxillary-arch-distalization approach in treating class II division 1 malocclusion: A systematic review.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of miniscrew-supported maxillary molar distalization according to temporary anchorage device features and appliance design: systematic review and meta-analysis.The Angle orthodontist · 2024Pooled it
- Treatment outcomes of class II malocclusion with total arch distalization using infrazygomatic crest screws: a retrospective study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Determination of pretreatment and patient cooperation factors affecting treatment outcome in orthodontic treatment with premolar extraction: a retrospective cohort study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Innovative Aesthetic and Functional Orthodontic Planning with Hard and Soft Tissue Analyses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Sleep disruption and premolar absence, NHANES, 2017-2020: A cross-sectional study.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2024Article
- Correlation Between Cephalometric Values and Soft Tissue Profile in Class I and Class II Adult Patients based on Vertical Patterns.Turkish journal of orthodontics · 2024Article
- Efficacy of mandibular molar distalization by clear aligner treatment.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2021Article
- Reducing metal artifacts between implants in cone-beam CT by adjusting angular position of the subject.Oral radiology · 2021Article
- Quantitative analysis of metal artefacts of dental implant in CBCT image by correlation analysis to micro-CT: A microstructural study.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2021Article
- Validity and reliability of a trigonometry-based method for the measurement of tooth movement on digital models.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2021Article
- A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis: Maxillary Dentition Distalization with the Aid of Microimplant in Lingual Orthodontics.International journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Distalization in Orthodontics: A Review and Case Series.Case reports in dentistry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byReader's Forum.2018
- Commented on byReader's Forum.2019
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue treatment effects of nonextraction therapy using the modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) to those of premolar extraction (PE) treatment in adult patients with Class II malocclusion.
methodsPretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalographs of 40 adult patients with Class II malocclusion were retrospectively analyzed. The MCPP group comprised 20 patients treated with total arch distalization of the maxillary arch while the PE group comprised 20 patients treated with four PE. Fifty-eight linear and angular measurements were analyzed to assess the changes before and after treatment. Descriptive statistics, paired
resultsThe MCPP group presented 3.4 mm of retraction, 1.0 mm of extrusion, and 7.3° lingual inclination of the maxillary central incisor. In comparison, the PE group displayed greater amount of maxillary central incisor retraction and retroclination, mandibular incisor retraction, and upper lip retraction (5.3 mm, 14.8°, 5.1 mm, and 2.0 mm, respectively;
conclusionsThese findings suggest the MCPP is an effective distalization appliance in the maxillary arch. The amount of incisor retraction, however, was significantly higher in the PE group. Therefore, four PE may be recommended when greater improvement of incisor position and soft-tissue profile is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.