ArticleMethodsX2018
A novel method for rapid and sensitive metagenomic activity screening.
Article in MethodsX, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A fast workflow to explore active enzymes from environmental samples through functional metagenomics.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Management of microbial enzymes for biofuels and biogas production by using metagenomic and genome editing approaches.3 Biotech · 2021Review
- Engineering of a chromogenic enzyme screening system based on an auxiliary indole-3-carboxylic acid monooxygenase.MicrobiologyOpen · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct cloning of metagenomes has proven to be a powerful tool for the exploration of the diverse sequence space of a microbial community leading to gene discovery and biocatalyst development. The key to such approach is the development of rapid, sensitive, and reliable functional screening of libraries. The majority of library screen have relied on the use of agar plates in petri dishes incorporating the target enzyme substrate for activity detection of positive clones (Iqbal et al. [1], Knietsch et al. [2], Popovic et al. [3]). In this article, a novel method is described consisting of: (1) formulation and application of substrate gel microtiter assay plates, (2) screening of libraries of clones in split pools in the wells of the assay plate, and (3) progressive enrichment and isolation of individual positive clones. The method has been successfully used in the rapid discovery of novel genes and enzymes from rumen microbial metagenome with high efficacy. •Novel substrate gel assay plates for activity screening with localized and intensified signals.•Rapid and complete screening of library clones in split pools.•Progressive enrichment scheme as a refining step for isolating target gene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.