Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30003038›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2018

It takes two to pantomime: Communication meets motor cognition.

Lisa Finkel, Katharina Hogrefe, Scott H Frey, Georg Goldenberg, Jennifer Randerath

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Apraxia: From Neuroanatomical Pathways to Clinical Manifestations.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Characterising factors underlying praxis deficits in chronic left hemisphere stroke patients.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Gesture deficits and apraxia in schizophrenia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lisa FinkelDepartment of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany; Lurija Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Health Research, Kliniken Schmieder, Allensbach, Germany.
Katharina HogrefeLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany.
Scott H FreyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, USA.
Georg GoldenbergTechnical University Munich, Germany; Medical Practice for Cognitive Neurology, Vienna, Austria.
Jennifer RanderathDepartment of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany; Lurija Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Health Research, Kliniken Schmieder, Allensbach, Germany. Electronic address: J_Randerath@hotmail.com.
University of Konstanz · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For over a century, pantomime of tool use has been employed to diagnose limb apraxia, a disorder of motor cognition primarily induced by left brain damage. While research consistently implicates damage to a left fronto-temporo-parietal network in limb apraxia, findings are inconsistent regarding the impact of damage to anterior versus posterior nodes within this network on pantomime. Complicating matters is the fact that tool use pantomime can be affected and evaluated at multiple levels. For instance, the production of tool use gestures requires the consideration of semantic characteristics (e.g. how to communicate the action intention) as well as motor features (e.g. forming grip and movement). Together, these factors may contribute substantially to apparent discrepancies in previously reported findings regarding neural correlates of tool use pantomime. In the current study, 67 stroke patients with unilateral left-brain damage performed a classic pantomime task. In order to analyze different error characteristics, we evaluated the proper use of grip and movement for each pantomime. For certain objects, healthy subjects may use body parts as representative for the object, e.g. use of the fingers to indicate scissors blades. To specify the pathological use of body parts as the object (BPO) we only assessed pantomime items that were not prone to this response in healthy participants. We performed modern voxel-based lesion analyses on MRI or CT data to determine associations between brain injury and the frequency of the specific types of pantomime errors. Our results support a model in which anterior and posterior nodes of the left fronto-temporo-parietal network contribute differentially to pantomime of tool use. More precisely, damage in the inferior frontal cortex reaching to the temporal pole is associated with an increased frequency of BPO errors, whereas damage to the inferior parietal lobe is predominantly linked to an increased frequency of movement and/or grip errors. Our work suggests that the validity of attempts to specify the neural correlates of limb apraxia based on tool use pantomime depends on differentiating the specific types of errors committed. We conclude that successful tool use pantomime involves dissociable functions with communicative aspects represented in more anterior (rather ventral) regions and motor-cognitive aspects in more posterior (rather dorsal) nodes of a left fronto-temporo-parietal network.

Indexed as

CommunicationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrainBrain MappingCognitionFemaleGesturesHumansImitative BehaviorMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPsychomotor PerformanceStrokeBPOCommunicationDual routesFDR, false discovery rateMotor cognitionNeural correlatesPantomimeVLSM, voxelwise lesion symptom mappingVOI, volumes of interest

Identifiers

PMID30003038
PMCPMC6039835
OpenAlexW2808967895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.