ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2018
It takes two to pantomime: Communication meets motor cognition.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond the moving hand: How gesture meaning shapes visual attention during observation and imitation.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Limb apraxia and active inference in the visuomotor pathways.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Standardization of gesture apraxia assessment in the elderly population of Olinda city in Northeast Brazil.Dementia & neuropsychologia · 2026Article
- Apraxia: From Neuroanatomical Pathways to Clinical Manifestations.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024Review
- Single-case disconnectome lesion-symptom mapping: Identifying two subtypes of limb apraxia.Neuropsychologia · 2022Article
- Mapping the human praxis network: an investigation of white matter disconnection in limb apraxia of gesture production.Brain communications · 2022Article
- Neural encoding and functional interactions underlying pantomimed movements.Brain structure & function · 2021Article
- Characterising factors underlying praxis deficits in chronic left hemisphere stroke patients.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2021Article
- Nonverbal Semantics Test (NVST)-A Novel Diagnostic Tool to Assess Semantic Processing Deficits: Application to Persons with Aphasia after Cerebrovascular Accident.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Pantomime of tool use: looking beyond apraxia.Brain communications · 2021Review
- Improvement of Apraxia With Augmented Reality: Influencing Pantomime of Tool Use via Holographic Cues.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Gesture deficits and apraxia in schizophrenia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2020Review
- Post-stroke cognitive deficits rarely come alone: Handling co-morbidity in lesion-behaviour mapping.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- Is This Within Reach? Left but Not Right Brain Damage Affects Affordance Judgment Tendencies.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Gestures convey different physiological responses when performed toward and away from the body.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- A Role for the Action Observation Network in Apraxia After Stroke.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
- Is There Really a Loss of Agency in Patients With Apraxia of Tool Use?Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For over a century, pantomime of tool use has been employed to diagnose limb apraxia, a disorder of motor cognition primarily induced by left brain damage. While research consistently implicates damage to a left fronto-temporo-parietal network in limb apraxia, findings are inconsistent regarding the impact of damage to anterior versus posterior nodes within this network on pantomime. Complicating matters is the fact that tool use pantomime can be affected and evaluated at multiple levels. For instance, the production of tool use gestures requires the consideration of semantic characteristics (e.g. how to communicate the action intention) as well as motor features (e.g. forming grip and movement). Together, these factors may contribute substantially to apparent discrepancies in previously reported findings regarding neural correlates of tool use pantomime. In the current study, 67 stroke patients with unilateral left-brain damage performed a classic pantomime task. In order to analyze different error characteristics, we evaluated the proper use of grip and movement for each pantomime. For certain objects, healthy subjects may use body parts as representative for the object, e.g. use of the fingers to indicate scissors blades. To specify the pathological use of body parts as the object (BPO) we only assessed pantomime items that were not prone to this response in healthy participants. We performed modern voxel-based lesion analyses on MRI or CT data to determine associations between brain injury and the frequency of the specific types of pantomime errors. Our results support a model in which anterior and posterior nodes of the left fronto-temporo-parietal network contribute differentially to pantomime of tool use. More precisely, damage in the inferior frontal cortex reaching to the temporal pole is associated with an increased frequency of BPO errors, whereas damage to the inferior parietal lobe is predominantly linked to an increased frequency of movement and/or grip errors. Our work suggests that the validity of attempts to specify the neural correlates of limb apraxia based on tool use pantomime depends on differentiating the specific types of errors committed. We conclude that successful tool use pantomime involves dissociable functions with communicative aspects represented in more anterior (rather ventral) regions and motor-cognitive aspects in more posterior (rather dorsal) nodes of a left fronto-temporo-parietal network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.